Ude-Koeller, Susanne

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","304"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","313"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","194"],["dc.contributor.author","Ude-Koeller, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Knauer, Wilfried"],["dc.contributor.author","Viebahn, Christoph"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:15:12Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:15:12Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","This report briefly summarises anatomical practice at Gottingen University from its founding in 1737 until the Nazi period and gives a detailed account of how Nazi death penalty legislation and execution practice at Wolfenbuttel prison influenced the decision-making of the anatomists in charge at that time. Problems in the procurement of corpses, encountered almost continuously throughout Europe since the broad introduction of dissection into medical training in the early 18th century, were absent in Gottingen during periods of overt progress in anatomical sciences, e.g. under Albrecht von Haller (in office 1736-1753) and Jacob Henle (1853-1885), and at times when existing regulations were rigorously enforced by the authorities (1814-1851). Ample availability of corpses in the wake of more than 600 executions in Wolfenbuttel between 1935 and 1945 was curtailed only by transportation fuel shortages and resulted in the dissection of more than 200 Nazi victim corpses in the Gottingen anatomy course. Apparently, neither individual offers of voluntary body donation (dating from 1932 to 1937 and published here as the earliest documents of this kind), nor the strong tradition of high-level anatomical research, nor even the awareness of the University's Age of Enlightenment origin, prevented the unethical use of corpses of Nazi victims for medical teaching. The Gottingen example may add \"historical and moral detachment\" under unusual political and wartime pressures to the \"clinical and emotional detachment\" thought to prevail amongst anatomy personnel (Hildebrandt, in this issue); together with the other reports it calls for all anatomists to bear in mind their ever present ethical obligations in respect to activities involving the use of corpses, both in medical schools and in the public domain. (c) 2012 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.aanat.2012.03.002"],["dc.identifier.isi","000306039500012"],["dc.identifier.pmid","22561074"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/27622"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Gmbh, Urban & Fischer Verlag"],["dc.relation.issn","0940-9602"],["dc.title","Anatomical practice at Gottingen University since the Age of Enlightenment and the fate of victims from Wolfenbuttel prison under Nazi rule"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","63"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ethik in der Medizin"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","70"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","18"],["dc.contributor.author","Ude-Koeller, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Luise"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-10-16T10:54:26Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-10-16T10:54:26Z"],["dc.date.issued","2006"],["dc.description.abstract","Wir diskutieren ethische Probleme der medizinischen Behandlung intersexueller Kinder. Gefragt wird nach dem Stellenwert von Elternwünschen nach eindeutiger Geschlechtszuweisung sowie nach den Konfliktfeldern, die zum einen zwischen konkurrierenden Wunschvorstellungen der Eltern und der behandelnden Ärzte, zum andern zwischen Kindeswohl und Kinderrechten entstehen können. Gegenwärtig wird Neugeborenen mit anatomisch uneindeutigem Genital trotz unsicherer Prognose über die Behandlungsergebnisse oft noch ein Geschlecht zugewiesen und operativ erstellt. Dieses Vorgehen ist von verschiedenen Seiten ethisch heftig kritisiert worden. Kipnis u. Diamond forderten 1998 im „Journal of Clinical Ethics“ ein Moratorium für alle nicht vital indizierten geschlechtskorrigierenden Eingriffe. Diese Forderung orientiert sich am Interesse des zukünftigen Erwachsenen, betont dessen prospektive Autonomie und klammert den Elternwunsch aus. Dieses „Modell des antizipierten Konsenses“ kann jedoch mit Bezug auf Neugeborene und Kleinkinder bedeutsame Aspekte des Eltern-Kind-Verhältnisses nicht angemessen erfassen. Im Aufsatz werden Argumente angeführt, die es aus Sicht einer Ethik der Elternschaft rechtfertigen, ethische Entscheidungen auf der Basis eines beziehungsorientierten Modells zu treffen. In unserem Modell fallen Elternwünsche ethisch ins Gewicht."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00481-006-0414-1"],["dc.identifier.gro","3146724"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9396"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","0935-7335"],["dc.title","Junge oder Mädchen?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","537"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","12"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Aktuelle Dermatologie"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","545"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","43"],["dc.contributor.author","Ude-Koeller, S."],["dc.contributor.author","Fuchs, T."],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:12:25Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:12:25Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1055/s-0043-110985"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1438-938X"],["dc.identifier.issn","0340-2541"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/74364"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","100 Jahre Hautklinik an der Georg-August-Universität in Göttingen: Die Moulagensammlung"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","671"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Journal of Pediatrics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","679"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","169"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Ude-Koeller, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Sinnecker, Gernot H. G."],["dc.contributor.author","Thyen, Ute"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-10-16T10:54:27Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-10-16T10:54:27Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","The medical management of differences of sex development (DSD)/intersex in early childhood has been criticized by patients’ advocates as well as bioethicists from an ethical point of view. Some call for a moratorium of any feminizing or masculinizing operations before the age of consent except for medical emergencies. No exhaustive ethical guidelines have been published until now. In particular, the role of the parents as legal representatives of the child is controversial. In the article, we develop, discuss, and present ethical principles and recommendations for the medical management of intersex/DSD in children and adolescents. We specify three basic ethical principles that have to be respected and substantiate them. The article includes a critical discussion of the best interest of the child and of family privacy. The argumentation draws upon recommendations by the working group “Bioethics and Intersex” within the German Network DSD/Intersex, which are presented in detail. Unlike other recommendations with regard to intersex, these guidelines represent a comprehensive view of the perspectives of clinicians, patients, and their families."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00431-009-1086-x"],["dc.identifier.gro","3146737"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/4244"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9410"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","first published online: 2009"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","0340-6199"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Ethical principles and recommendations for the medical management of differences of sex development (DSD)/intersex in children and adolescents"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]