Now showing 1 - 10 of 20
  • 2020Book Chapter
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","137"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","160"],["dc.contributor.author","Klauk, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Köppe, Tilmann Arndt"],["dc.contributor.editor","Fludernik, Monika"],["dc.contributor.editor","Nielsen, Henrik Skov"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-09-29T06:43:53Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-09-29T06:43:53Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/89767"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.publisher","Peter Lang"],["dc.publisher.place","Frankfurt a.M."],["dc.relation.ispartof","Travelling Concepts. New Fictionality Studies"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Abteilung Neuere deutsche Literatur"],["dc.title","Authors, Fictional Narrators and Literary Appreciation"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details
  • 2011-04-07Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","81"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Literary Theory"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","93"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","5"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Köppe, Tilmann;"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Kindt, Tom;"],["dc.contributor.author","Köppe, Tilmann"],["dc.contributor.author","Kindt, Tom"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-11-28T10:29:42Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-11-28T10:29:42Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011-04-07"],["dc.date.updated","2022-11-27T10:13:36Z"],["dc.description.abstract","The article outlines an explication of the concept of ›mimetically unreliable narration‹ i. e. the idea that a fictional narrative is reliable if it gives an unobjectionable account of the fictional facts, and unreliable, if it does not.While we agree with the majority of contemporary narratology that a narrator can be distrusted in a number of different ways, we argue that the diversity of mimetical unreliability runs deeper than is generally acknowledged. There is a distinction to be made that is based on the question whether the unreliable narration has, or has not, a narrator in the first place. Thus we claim that there are two kinds of mimetically unreliable narrations: ones with a narrator and ones without a narrator. The paper explains this distinction and defends it against a number of objections.In the introduction of our paper, we argue for the assumption that not every fictional narrative has a fictional narrator by drawing on a certain understanding of fictionality According to the so-called ›institutional Theory of Fiction‹, fictional texts ask their readers to adopt a particular, rule-governed attitude of reception towards the text. Adopting this attitude means, centrally, to treat the sentences of the text as an invitation to imagine certain things. Some fictional texts invite their readers to imagine that there is a fictional narrator. This means that the text prompts us to imagine that we are reading or listening to someone's narrative. Some fictional narratives do not prompt us to imagine anything of the text of the work or about a teller. Instead, these narratives require us to merely use the sentences of the work as a prop to imagine certain things based on their content.Based on this observation, we argue that both kinds of fictional narratives can be mimetically unreliable and propose to clarify the concept of mimetical unreliability as follows: The narration expressed by a literary work is mimetically unreliable if, and only if, the work authorizes imagining that the narrator does not provide completely accurate information, or the work does not authorize imagining that there is a narrator; instead it seemingly, or prima facie, authorizes imagining states of affairs that are not completely accurate. We elaborate on the components of this proposal, dwell on some of its apparent problems, comment on several competing understandings of unreliability in fictional narratives, discuss the question whether it should be seen as a comparative or as a classificatory term, and briefly address the concept's ascription in the context of textual interpretation.The distinction between unreliable narrations with a narrator and without is not meant to replace other current distinctions between varieties of unreliability in fictional narratives. The main interest of our proposal lies in the way it uses the theory of fiction in order to shed light on narrative unreliability. Narrative unreliability, in our view, is a complex phenomenon in that its explanation presupposes some such theoretical underpinning."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1515/jlt.2011.007"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/117465"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.publisher","Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG"],["dc.relation.eissn","1862-8990"],["dc.relation.issn","1862-5290"],["dc.title","Unreliable Narration With a Narrator and Without"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2012-12-12Review
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","271"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Arbitrium"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","274"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","30"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Köppe, Tilmann;"],["dc.contributor.author","Köppe, Tilmann"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-11-28T11:18:44Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-11-28T11:18:44Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012-12-12"],["dc.date.updated","2022-11-27T10:29:07Z"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1515/arb-2012-0072"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/117689"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.publisher","De Gruyter"],["dc.relation.eissn","1865-8849"],["dc.relation.issn","0723-2977"],["dc.relation.reviewededitor","Schneider, Jost"],["dc.relation.reviewof","Methodengeschichte der Germanistik"],["dc.title","Jost Schneider (Hg.), Methodengeschichte der Germanistik"],["dc.type","review"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2008Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Literary Theory"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","18"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","2"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Dennerlein, Christoph;"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Köppe, Tilmann;"],["dc.contributor.affiliation","Werner, Jan C.;"],["dc.contributor.author","Dennerlein, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Köppe, Tilmann"],["dc.contributor.author","Werner, Jan C."],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-11-28T10:32:09Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-11-28T10:32:09Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.date.updated","2022-11-27T10:13:53Z"],["dc.description.abstract","This article explores the possibilities of evaluating interpretations that belong to different ›schools of interpretation‹ by means of a single shared standard. Such a standard becomes available once interpretation is described as a critical activity, that is, as something that we do. Accordingly, we describe critical activities in terms of categories taken from the theory of action. A basic action lends itself to a reason explanation. Such an explanation specifies both the goals of the agent and the means he employs for attaining them. It thereby reflects his preferences and beliefs that constitute his reasons for goal-directed action. On this descriptive basis we turn to the evaluation of interpretive activities. The theory of practical reasoning has developed a number of ways for criticizing an agent's beliefs and preferences which can be transferred to the evaluation of acts of interpretation. Thus an agent's beliefs are open to a straightforward epistemic criticism while his preferences can be criticized with reference to their epistemic basis, formal structure, and on ›substantial‹ grounds. We suggest that this approach to the evaluation of interpretation combines a number of advantages: First, by operating in the realm of practical rationality (as opposed to theoretical rationality), the approach avoids the thorny questions involved in settling the question of whether interpretative claims can be true or false. Second, it emphasizes the importance of an interpreter's preferences which have been neglected in most previous accounts. Third, our approach operates on a purely formal level and does not make recourse to the aims and subject matter of particular schools of interpretation. Therefore, it might be acceptable for those theoretical schools that are notorious for rejecting the idea of a methodologically guided approach to interpretation. Fourth, it suggests a meta-critical program for analyzing and evaluating interpretations, that it is hoped, can easily be put into practice."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1515/JLT.2008.002"],["dc.identifier.fs","316301"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/8376"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/117486"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes","This publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence and a national licence (funded by the DFG, German Research Foundation) respectively."],["dc.notes.intern","Migrated from goescholar"],["dc.publisher","Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG"],["dc.relation.eissn","1862-8990"],["dc.relation.issn","1862-5290"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Philosophische Fakultät"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.access","openAccess"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject","Interpretation; Theoriedebatte; Literaturwissenschaft"],["dc.title","Interpretation: Struktur und Evaluation in handlungstheoretischer Perspektive"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2020Book Chapter
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","459"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","474"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volumetitle","Begriffe, Methoden und Analysedimensionen"],["dc.contributor.author","Köppe, Tilmann Arndt"],["dc.contributor.editor","Hillebrandt, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.editor","Klimek, Sonja"],["dc.contributor.editor","Müller, Ralph"],["dc.contributor.editor","Zymner, Rüdiger"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-09-29T06:43:47Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-09-29T06:43:47Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/89766"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.publisher","De Gruyter"],["dc.publisher.place","Berlin"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Grundfragen der Lyrikologie"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Abteilung Neuere deutsche Literatur"],["dc.title","Performative Interpretation, ästhetische Wertschätzung und lyrische Expressivität"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details
  • 2008Monograph
    [["dc.contributor.author","Köppe, Tilmann Arndt"],["dc.contributor.author","Winko, Simone"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-10-01T09:33:41Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-10-01T09:33:41Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.identifier.isbn","978-3-476-02059-8"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/89828"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.publisher","Metzler"],["dc.publisher.place","Stuttgart"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Abteilung Neuere deutsche Literatur"],["dc.title","Neuere Literaturtheorien"],["dc.title.subtitle","Eine Einführung"],["dc.type","book"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details
  • 2016Monograph
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.seriesnr","Volume 55"],["dc.contributor.author","Köppe, Tilmann Arndt"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-10-01T06:35:21Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-10-01T06:35:21Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/89809"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.publisher","De Gruyter"],["dc.publisher.place","Göttingen"],["dc.relation.crisseries","Linguae & Litterae"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Abteilung Neuere deutsche Literatur"],["dc.title","Erzählte Selbstrepräsentation im modernen Roman"],["dc.type","book"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details
  • 2020Journal Article Research Paper
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Hermeneutische Blätter"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","19"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","26"],["dc.contributor.author","Köppe, Tilmann Arndt"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-09-29T06:44:13Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-09-29T06:44:13Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/89769"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Abteilung Neuere deutsche Literatur"],["dc.title","Über Angst in der Literatur"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details
  • 2008Thesis Doctoral Thesis
    [["dc.contributor.advisorcorporation","Universität Göttingen"],["dc.contributor.author","Köppe, Tilmann Arndt"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-10-01T09:33:31Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-10-01T09:33:31Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/89826"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.publisher","Mentis"],["dc.publisher.place","Paderborn"],["dc.relation.crisseries","Explicatio"],["dc.title","Literatur und Erkenntnis"],["dc.title.subtitle","Studien zur kognitiven Signifikanz fiktionaler literarischer Werke"],["dc.type","thesis"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","dissertation"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details
  • 2014-07-15Lecture
    [["dc.contributor.author","Köppe, Tilmann"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-07-05T12:14:03Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-07-05T12:14:03Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014-07-15"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/87554"],["dc.notes.intern","Audiodatei nicht vorhanden"],["dc.relation.conference","Klassiker, Thriller, Ladenhüter: Wie Texte gebaut sind und wie sie wirken"],["dc.relation.date","2014-07-15"],["dc.relation.eventlocation","Göttingen"],["dc.title","Angenehmes Grauen"],["dc.title.subtitle","Warum wir Thriller lieben"],["dc.type","lecture"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details