Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","603"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","614"],["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth"],["dc.contributor.editor","Soeffner, Hans-Georg"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-10-16T10:55:33Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-10-16T10:55:33Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","In diesem Beitrag möchte ich über eine relationalistische Perspektive auf den Zusammenhang von Religion und Migration nachdenken, einige Fragestellungen konturieren und mit empirischen Beispielen illustrieren. Der Ausgangspunkt meiner Überlegungen ist das „Manifesto for a Relational Sociology“ von Mustafa Emirbayer (1997). Darin kontrastiert er idealtypisch eine substantialistische und eine relationalistische soziologische Perspektive. Laut Emirbayer stellen „substantialistische“ Ansätze auf Entitäten ab, sei es der einzelne Akteur (Mikro), symbolische Interaktion oder Organisationen (Meso) oder ganze Gesellschaften bis hin zur Weltgesellschaft (Makro). Im Unterschied dazu betrachten ‚relationalistische‘ Zugänge, wie sich Entitäten in Beziehungen immer wieder neu ausrichten und formieren."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/978-3-531-18971-0_59"],["dc.identifier.gro","3147014"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9670"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.publisher","Springer Fachmedien"],["dc.publisher.place","Wiesbaden"],["dc.relation.doi","10.1007/978-3-531-18971-0"],["dc.relation.isbn","978-3-531-18169-1"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Transnationale Vergesellschaftungen:Verhandlungen des 35. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Frankfurt am Main 2010"],["dc.title","Religionssoziologie in ‚relationalistischer‘ Perspektive: Migration und religiöse Netzwerke"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","39"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","52"],["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth"],["dc.contributor.editor","Diemling, P."],["dc.contributor.editor","Westermann, J."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-02-06T12:56:20Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-02-06T12:56:20Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/11986"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.publisher","Peter Lang"],["dc.publisher.place","Frankfurt"],["dc.relation.isbn","978-3-631-61367-2"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Und was machst Du später damit? Berufsperspektiven für Religionswissenschaftler und Absolventen anderer Kleiner Fächer."],["dc.title","Zu den (In-)Kompetenzen von Religionswissenschaftlern"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-02-08T08:24:16Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-02-08T08:24:16Z"],["dc.date.issued","2007"],["dc.description.abstract","The Bologna-Process for a European Higher Education Area has been unfolding signifi- cant impact on European Higher Education Systems. Launched as an intergovernmental initiative on the level of national ministries the process transcends national interests and has become a hybrid structure of education policy making between the nation states and the European Union. Moreover, the internationalisation of education politics embodied by the Bologna-Process has been accompanied by a reconfiguration of the political ac- tor-set. I my presentation I want to propose a structural analysis of this political process by means of network analysis. Based on a quantitative analysis of policy documents I will reflect on relevant policy actors and their relationships as well as trace the development the process has taken in its double hybrid setting between national and supranational, public and private stakeholders. In detail, two questions will be addressed: (i) Can we find a “structural Europeanisation” of higher education policy, e.g. reflected by an in— crease of European corporative actors in the Bologna—Process? And (ii) is transnational policy making a chance for democratisation (e.g. by involving formerly marginalised actors) and rationalisation of education politics? My conclusion will focus on the ambivalent nature of European higher education policy between the national “cannot” and the supranational “must not” (subsidiarity). Policy networks are functional mediators between these levels and network analysis is thus an appropriate means for European education policy research."],["dc.format.extent","15"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/12047"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.title","Network-Governance in European Education Policy – Actors, relations and perspectives in the Bologna-Process."],["dc.type","working_paper"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","27"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","45"],["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth"],["dc.contributor.author","Dick, Eva"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-11-29T14:26:24Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-11-29T14:26:24Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.fs.externid","880230"],["dc.fs.pkfprnr","66566"],["dc.identifier.fs","623258"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/10942"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","FactScience-Import"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.publisher","Routledge"],["dc.publisher.place","London"],["dc.relation.isbn","978-1-13-893072-8"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Spiritualizing the City: Agency and Resilience of the Urban and Urbanesque Habitat"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Soziologie"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Abteilung III: Kultursoziologie"],["dc.title","Governing religious diversity in urban contexts: The interplay of religious and state representatives in local interfaith networks"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","175"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Religion in Europe"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","200"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","6"],["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-10-16T10:55:34Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-10-16T10:55:34Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","Global competition and demographic change have put modern welfare states under pressure. To ensure budget consolidation without too harsh a retrenchment of benefits, privatization and competition have become white hopes in the social-political debate. As states are courting civil society to take over responsibility in the realm of social welfare, they create opportunity structures for religious communities to re-enter the public sphere. While it has become fashionable to announce the resurgence of religion in heroic diagnoses of the world order, little attention has been given to what is going on below on the meso-level of public-private collaboration between religious and non-religious organizations. In this article I will examine US welfare reform as a strong case of privatization and communalization of welfare responsibility, which involves an explicit invitation to religious communities to join in as public social service providers. I will argue for a religious studies perspective to religion and social politics that focuses on the semantic patterns of the political discourse and explore the guiding semantics of public-private partnerships from the initial Charitable Choice legislation under the Clinton government to George W. Bush’s Faith-based Initiative and finally to the New Era of Partnerships announced by Barack Obama."],["dc.fs.externid","880230"],["dc.fs.pkfprnr","66566"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1163/18748929-00602003"],["dc.identifier.fs","618323"],["dc.identifier.gro","3147026"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9683"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","1874-8910"],["dc.subject","public religion; social politics; political rhetorics; welfare; faith-based organizations"],["dc.title","Agents, Armies, Allies: Semantics of Public-Private Partnerships in US Welfare Reform"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","111"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Annual Review of the Sociology of Religion"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","127"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","10"],["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-29T12:13:58Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-29T12:13:58Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","In this paper I examine how religious differences are articulated and dealt with in interreligious activities, such as joint prayers for peace, interfaith dialogue or open days. I assume that interreligious activities are an instrument for modern societies to govern and domesticate religious pluralization. In the conceptual part of the paper I combine elements from Symbolic Interactionism with social anthropological concepts of boundary work in order to understand the enactment of religious difference in organized forms of interreligious encounter: With reference to Erving Goffman I analyze interreligious activities as “interaction rituals” which ceremonialize the tension between transgression and maintenance of religious boundaries. In the empirical part of the paper I will draw from participant observation in 27 interreligious activities and elaborate seven ideal types of managing religious diversity and difference though symbolical interaction."],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/62135"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Soziologie"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Abteilung III: Kultursoziologie"],["dc.title","Enacting Diversity: Boundary Work and Performative Dynamics in Interreligious Activities"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","133"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Soziologische Revue"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","145"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","35"],["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-10-16T10:55:34Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-10-16T10:55:34Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1524/srsr.2012.0012"],["dc.identifier.gro","3147025"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9682"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","0343-4109"],["dc.title","Substantiiert du noch oder relationierst du schon? Eine Momentaufnahme zur Selbstfindung der deutschen Netzwerkforschung"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","345"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","355"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.seriesnr","258"],["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth"],["dc.contributor.editor","Kreutzer, Ansgar"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-11-29T14:26:25Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-11-29T14:26:25Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.fs.externid","880230"],["dc.fs.pkfprnr","66566"],["dc.identifier.fs","618336"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/10951"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","FactScience-Import"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.publisher","Herder Verlag"],["dc.publisher.place","Freiburg im Breisgau"],["dc.relation.crisseries","Quaestiones Disputatae"],["dc.relation.isbn","978-3-451-02258-6"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Im Dialog. Systematische Theologie und Religionssoziologie"],["dc.relation.ispartofseries","Quaestiones disputatae; 258"],["dc.title","Differenzierung und Interpenetration von Religion und Politik"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1013"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1030"],["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth"],["dc.contributor.editor","Rehberg, K.-S."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-02-06T13:31:11Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-02-06T13:31:11Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/11993"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.publisher","Campus"],["dc.publisher.place","Frankfurt/Main"],["dc.relation.isbn","978-3-593-38440-5"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Die Natur der Gesellschaft. Verhandlungen des 33. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Kassel 2006."],["dc.title","Endzeit-Geist: Moderne Apokalypsen als Krisenhermeneutik"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth"],["dc.contributor.editor","Pollack, Detlef"],["dc.contributor.editor","Krech, Volkhard"],["dc.contributor.editor","Müller, Olaf"],["dc.contributor.editor","Hero, Markus"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-01-11T12:00:20Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-01-11T12:00:20Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/11636"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.publisher.place","Wiesbaden"],["dc.relation.isbn","978-3-531-17536-2"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Handbuch Religionssoziologie"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Soziologie"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Abteilung III: Kultursoziologie"],["dc.title","Religion, Ethnizität und Migration"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]