Options
Zabel, Markus
Loading...
Preferred name
Zabel, Markus
Official Name
Zabel, Markus
Alternative Name
Zabel, M.
Main Affiliation
Now showing 1 - 10 of 52
2018Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","102"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","International Journal of Cardiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","107"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","272"],["dc.contributor.author","Bergau, Leonard"],["dc.contributor.author","Willems, Rik"],["dc.contributor.author","Sprenkeler, David J."],["dc.contributor.author","Fischer, Thomas H."],["dc.contributor.author","Flevari, Panayota"],["dc.contributor.author","Hasenfuß, Gerd"],["dc.contributor.author","Katsaras, Dimitrios"],["dc.contributor.author","Kirova, Aleksandra"],["dc.contributor.author","Lehnart, Stephan E."],["dc.contributor.author","Lüthje, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Röver, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Seegers, Joachim"],["dc.contributor.author","Sossalla, Samuel"],["dc.contributor.author","Dunnink, Albert"],["dc.contributor.author","Sritharan, Rajevaa"],["dc.contributor.author","Tuinenburg, Anton E."],["dc.contributor.author","Vandenberk, Bert"],["dc.contributor.author","Vos, Marc A."],["dc.contributor.author","Wijers, Sofieke C."],["dc.contributor.author","Friede, Tim"],["dc.contributor.author","Zabel, Markus"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:50:23Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:50:23Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.description.abstract","BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We prospectively investigated combinations of risk stratifiers including multiple EP diagnostics in a cohort study of ICD patients. METHODS: For 672 enrolled patients, we collected history, LVEF, EP study and T-wave alternans testing, 24-h Holter, NT-proBNP, and the eGFR. All-cause mortality and first appropriate ICD shock were predefined endpoints. RESULTS: The 635 patients included in the final analyses were 63 ± 13 years old, 81% were male, LVEF averaged 40 ± 14%, 20% were inducible at EP study, 63% had a primary prophylactic ICD. During follow-up over 4.3 ± 1.5 years, 108 patients died (4.0% per year), and appropriate shock therapy occurred in n = 96 (3.9% per year). In multivariate regression, age (p < 0.001), LVEF (p < 0.001), NYHA functional class (p = 0.007), eGFR (p = 0.024), a history of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.011), and NT-pro-BNP (p = 0.002) were predictors of mortality. LVEF (p = 0.002), inducibility at EP study (p = 0.007), and secondary prophylaxis (p = 0.002) were identified as independent predictors of appropriate shocks. A high annualized risk of shocks of about 10% per year was prevalent in the upper quintile of the shock score. In contrast, a low annual risk of shocks (1.8% per year) was found in the lower two quintiles of the shock score. The lower two quintiles of the mortality score featured an annual mortality <0.6%. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective ICD patient cohort, a very good approximation of mortality versus arrhythmic risk was possible using a multivariable diagnostic strategy. EP stimulation is the best test to assess risk of arrhythmias resulting in ICD shocks."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.103"],["dc.identifier.pmid","29983251"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/15929"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/59764"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.intern","In goescholar not merged with http://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/15360 but duplicate"],["dc.relation","info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/241526/EU//EUTRIGTREAT"],["dc.relation.issn","1874-1754"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC-ND 4.0"],["dc.rights.access","openAccess"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.subject.mesh","Aged"],["dc.subject.mesh","Aged, 80 and over"],["dc.subject.mesh","Arrhythmias, Cardiac"],["dc.subject.mesh","Cohort Studies"],["dc.subject.mesh","Death, Sudden, Cardiac"],["dc.subject.mesh","Defibrillators"],["dc.subject.mesh","Defibrillators, Implantable"],["dc.subject.mesh","Female"],["dc.subject.mesh","Follow-Up Studies"],["dc.subject.mesh","Humans"],["dc.subject.mesh","Male"],["dc.subject.mesh","Middle Aged"],["dc.subject.mesh","Mortality"],["dc.subject.mesh","Multivariate Analysis"],["dc.subject.mesh","Natriuretic Peptide, Brain"],["dc.subject.mesh","Peptide Fragments"],["dc.subject.mesh","Prospective Studies"],["dc.subject.mesh","Risk Factors"],["dc.title","Differential multivariable risk prediction of appropriate shock versus competing mortality - A prospective cohort study to estimate benefits from ICD therapy"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC2012Journal Article Research Paper [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","416"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","EP Europace"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","422"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","14"],["dc.contributor.author","Seegers, Joachim"],["dc.contributor.author","Vos, Marc A."],["dc.contributor.author","Flevari, Panagiota"],["dc.contributor.author","Willems, Rik"],["dc.contributor.author","Sohns, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Vollmann, Dirk"],["dc.contributor.author","Luethje, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Kremastinos, Dimitrios T."],["dc.contributor.author","Flore, Vincent"],["dc.contributor.author","Meine, Mathias"],["dc.contributor.author","Tuinenburg, Anton"],["dc.contributor.author","Myles, Rachel C."],["dc.contributor.author","Simon, Dirk"],["dc.contributor.author","Brockmöller, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Friede, Tim"],["dc.contributor.author","Hasenfuß, Gerd"],["dc.contributor.author","Lehnart, Stephan E."],["dc.contributor.author","Zabel, Markus"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:48:57Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:48:57Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","Aims The EUTrigTreat clinical study has been designed as a prospective multicentre observational study and aims to (i) risk stratify patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for mortality and shock risk using multiple novel and established risk markers, (ii) explore a link between repolarization biomarkers and genetics of ion (Ca-2, Na, K) metabolism, (iii) compare the results of invasive and non-invasive electrophysiological (EP) testing, (iv) assess changes of non-invasive risk stratification tests over time, and (v) associate arrythmogenomic risk through 19 candidate genes. Methods and results Patients with clinical ICD indication are eligible for the trial. Upon inclusion, patients will undergo non-invasive risk stratification, including beat-to-beat variability of repolarization (BVR), T-wave alternans, T-wave morphology variables, ambient arrhythmias from Holter, heart rate variability, and heart rate turbulence. Non-invasive or invasive programmed electrical stimulation will assess inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias, with the latter including recordings of monophasic action potentials and assessment of restitution properties. Established candidate genes are screened for variants. The primary endpoint is all-cause mortality, while one of the secondary endpoints is ICD shock risk. A mean follow-up of 3.3 years is anticipated. Non-invasive testing will be repeated annually during follow-up. It has been calculated that 700 patients are required to identify risk predictors of the primary endpoint, with a possible increase to 1000 patients based on interim risk analysis. Conclusion The EUTrigTreat clinical study aims to overcome current shortcomings in sudden cardiac death risk stratification and to answer several related research questions. The initial patient recruitment is expected to be completed in July 2012, and follow-up is expected to end in September 2014. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01209494."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/europace/eur352"],["dc.identifier.gro","3142572"],["dc.identifier.isi","000300717700021"],["dc.identifier.pmid","22117037"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/7031"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/8937"],["dc.notes.intern","WoS Import 2017-03-10 / Funder: European Community [HEALTH-F2-2009-241526, EUTrigTreat]"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.relation.issn","1099-5129"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Rationale, objectives, and design of the EUTrigTreat clinical study: a prospective observational study for arrhythmia risk stratification and assessment of interrelationships among repolarization markers and genotype"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2012Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","819"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","9"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of the American College of Cardiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","824"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","59"],["dc.contributor.author","Vollmann, Dirk"],["dc.contributor.author","Stevenson, William G."],["dc.contributor.author","Luethje, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Sohns, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","John, Roy M."],["dc.contributor.author","Zabel, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Michaud, Gregory F."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:13:18Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:13:18Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and mechanism of a misleading long post-pacing interval (PPI) upon entrainment of typical atrial flutter (AFL) from the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI). Background In typical AFL, the PPI from entrainment at the CTI is expected to closely match the tachycardia cycle-length (TCL). Methods Sixty patients with confirmed CTI-dependent AFL were retrospectively analyzed and grouped into short (<= 30 ms) or long (>30 ms) PPI-TCL. Thereafter, we prospectively studied 16 patients to acquire the PPI-TCL at 4 CTI sites with entrainment at pacing cycle-lengths (PCLs) 10 to 40 ms shorter than the TCL. Conduction times during AFL and entrainment were compared in 5 segments of the AFL circuit. Results Eleven patients (18%) in the retrospective analysis had a long PPI-TCL after entrainment from the CTI. Subjects with long PPI-TCL had similar baseline characteristics but greater beat-to-beat TCL variability. In the prospective cohort, PPI-TCL was influenced by the difference between PCL and TCL and site of entrainment. Conduction delays associated with a long PPI-TCL were located predominantly in the segment activated first by the paced orthodromic wave front, and were mainly due to local pacing latency, as confirmed by the use of monophasic action potential catheters. Conclusions A long PPI upon entrainment of typical AFL from the CTI is common and due to delayed conduction with entrainment. Whether these findings apply to other macro-re-entrant tachycardias warrants further investigation. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 819-24) (C) 2012 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.023"],["dc.identifier.isi","000300609300008"],["dc.identifier.pmid","22361402"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/27142"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Science Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","0735-1097"],["dc.title","Misleading Long Post-Pacing Interval After Entrainment of Typical Atrial Flutter From the Cavotricuspid Isthmus"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2009Journal Article Research Paper [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","273"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Journal of Heart Failure"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","280"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","11"],["dc.contributor.author","Luethje, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Renner, Bernd"],["dc.contributor.author","Kessels, Roger"],["dc.contributor.author","Vollmann, Dirk"],["dc.contributor.author","Raupach, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Gerritse, Bart"],["dc.contributor.author","Tasci, Selcuk"],["dc.contributor.author","Schwab, Joerg O."],["dc.contributor.author","Zabel, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Zenker, Dieter"],["dc.contributor.author","Schott, Peter"],["dc.contributor.author","Hasenfuß, Gerd"],["dc.contributor.author","Unterberg-Buchwald, Christina"],["dc.contributor.author","Andreas, Stefan"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:47:31Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:47:31Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.description.abstract","Aims The combined therapeutic impact of atrial overdrive pacing (ACIP) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on central steep apnoea (CSA) in chronic heart failure (CHF) so far has not been investigated. We aimed to evaluate the effect of CRT alone and CRT + AOP on CSA in CHF patients and to compare the influence of CRT on CHF between CSA positive and CSA negative patients. Methods and results Thirty patients with CRT indication underwent full night polysomnography, echocardiography, exercise testing, and neurohumoral evaluation before and 3 months after CRT implantation. In CSA positive patients (60%), two additional steep studies were conducted after 3 months of CRT, with CRT alone or CRT + ACIP, in random order. Cardiac resynchronization therapy resulted in significant improvements of NYHA class, left ventricular ejection fraction, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, VO(2)max, and quality of life irrespective of the presence of CSA. Cardiac resynchronization therapy also reduced the central apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) (33.6 +/- 14.3 vs. 23.8 +/- 16.9 h(-1); P < 0.01) and central apnoea index (17.3 +/- 14.1 vs. 10.9 +/- 13.9 h(-1); P < 0.01) without altering steep stages. Cardiac resynchronization therapy with atrial overdrive pacing resulted in a small but significant additional decrease of the central AHI (23.8 +/- 16.9 vs. 21.5 +/- 16.9 h(-1); P < 0.01). Conclusion In this study, CRT significantly improved CSA without altering sleep stages. Cardiac resynchronization therapy with atrial. overdrive pacing resulted in a significant but minor additional improvement of CSA. Positive effects of CRT were irrespective of the presence of CSA."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/eurjhf/hfn042"],["dc.identifier.gro","3143143"],["dc.identifier.isi","000265845700008"],["dc.identifier.pmid","19147446"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/625"],["dc.notes.intern","WoS Import 2017-03-10 / Funder: Bakken Research Center, Maastricht, Netherlands"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.publisher","Oxford Univ Press"],["dc.relation.issn","1388-9842"],["dc.title","Cardiac resynchronization therapy and atrial overdrive pacing for the treatment of central sleep apnoea"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2009Journal Article Discussion [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","517"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Clinical Research in Cardiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","520"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","98"],["dc.contributor.author","Seegers, Joachim"],["dc.contributor.author","Luethje, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Zabel, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Vollmann, Dirk"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:25:54Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:25:54Z"],["dc.date.issued","2009"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00392-009-0040-2"],["dc.identifier.isi","000268511200008"],["dc.identifier.pmid","19554254"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/11200"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/56732"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Dr Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag"],["dc.relation.issn","1861-0684"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Loss of capture late after right ventricular pacing lead revision: what is the mechanism?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.subtype","letter_note"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2014Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","430"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","American Heart Journal"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","437"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","168"],["dc.contributor.author","Zabel, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Mueller-Riemenschneider, Falk"],["dc.contributor.author","Geller, J. Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Brachmann, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Kuehlkamp, Volker"],["dc.contributor.author","Dissmann, Ruediger"],["dc.contributor.author","Reinhold, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Roll, Stephanie"],["dc.contributor.author","Luethje, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Bode, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Eckardt, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Willich, Stefan N."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:34:27Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:34:27Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Background and aims Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) remote follow-up and ICD remote monitoring (RM) are established means of ICD follow-up. The reduction of the number of in-office visits and the time to decision is proven, but the true clinical benefit is still unknown. Cost and cost-effectiveness of RM remain leading issues for its dissemination. The MONITOR-ICD study has been designed to assess costs, cost-effectiveness, and clinical benefits of RM versus standard-care follow-up in a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. Methods and results Patients indicated for single-or dual-chamber ICD are eligible for the study and are implanted an RM-capable Biotronik ICD (Lumax VR-T or Lumax DR-T; Biotronik SE & Co KG, Berlin, Germany). Implantable cardioverter defibrillator programming and alert-based clinical responses in the RM group are highly standardized by protocol. As of December 2011, recruitment has been completed, and 416 patients have been enrolled. Subjects are followed-up for a minimum of 12 months and a maximum of 24 months, ending in January 2013. Disease-specific costs from a societal perspective have been defined as primary end point and will be compared between RM and standard-care groups. Secondary end points include ICD shocks (including appropriate and inappropriate shocks), cardiovascular hospitalizations and cardiovascular mortality, and additional health economic end points. Conclusions The MONITOR-ICD study will be an important randomized RM study to report data on a primary economic end point in 2014. Its results on ICD shocks will add to the currently available evidence on clinical benefit of RM."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Biotronik SE GmbH & Co KG, Berlin, Germany"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.ahj.2014.04.021"],["dc.identifier.isi","000343096900007"],["dc.identifier.pmid","25262251"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/32170"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Mosby-elsevier"],["dc.relation.issn","1097-5330"],["dc.relation.issn","0002-8703"],["dc.title","Rationale and design of the MONITOR-ICD study: A randomized comparison of economic and clinical effects of automatic remote MONITORing versus control in patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2013Journal Article Discussion [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","927"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","12"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Clinical Research in Cardiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","929"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","102"],["dc.contributor.author","Sohns, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Luthje, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Zabel, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Vollmann, Dirk"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:17:18Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:17:18Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00392-013-0612-z"],["dc.identifier.isi","000327208800009"],["dc.identifier.pmid","23989651"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/28132"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.publisher.place","Heidelberg"],["dc.relation.issn","1861-0692"],["dc.relation.issn","1861-0684"],["dc.title","Supraventricular tachycardia with 'A-A-V' response upon ventricular entrainment and transient 2:1 AV conduction block"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.subtype","letter_note"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2011Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","127"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","134"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","27"],["dc.contributor.author","Sohns, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Sossalla, Samuel T."],["dc.contributor.author","Vollmann, Dirk"],["dc.contributor.author","Luethje, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Seegers, Joachim"],["dc.contributor.author","Schmitto, Jan Dieter"],["dc.contributor.author","Zabel, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Obenauer, Silvia"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:01:25Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:01:25Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of extracardiac findings diagnosed by 64-multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) examinations prior to circumferential pulmonary vein (PV) ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). A total of 158 patients (median age, 60.5 years; male 68%) underwent 64-MDCT of the chest and upper abdomen to characterize left atrial and PV anatomy prior to AF ablation. MDCT images were evaluated by a thoracic radiologist and a cardiologist. For additional scan interpretation, bone, lung, and soft tissue window settings were used. CT scans with extra-cardiac abnormalities categorized for the anatomic distribution and divided into two groups: Group 1-exhibiting clinically significant or potentially significant findings, and Group 2-patients with clinically non-significant findings. Extracardiac findings (n = 198) were observed in 113/158 (72%) patients. At least one significant finding was noted in 49/158 patients (31%). Group 1 abnormalities, such as malignancies or pneumonias, were found in 85/198 findings (43%). Group 2 findings, for example mild degenerative spine disease or pleural thickening, were observed in 113/198 findings (72%). 74/198 Extracardiac findings were located in the lung (37%), 35/198 in the mediastinum (18%), 8/198 into the liver (4%) and 81/198 were in other organs (41). There is an appreciable prevalence of prior undiagnosed extracardiac findings detected in patients with AF prior to PV-Isolation by MDCT. Clinically significant or potentially significant findings can be expected in similar to 40% of patients who undergo cardiac MDCT. Interdisciplinary trained personnel is required to identify and interpret both cardiac and extra cardiac findings."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s10554-010-9653-9"],["dc.identifier.isi","000287142900016"],["dc.identifier.pmid","20549365"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/8173"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/24422"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.relation.issn","1569-5794"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Extra cardiac findings by 64-multidetector computed tomography in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation prior to pulmonal vein isolation"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2010Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1460"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","EP Europace"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1466"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","12"],["dc.contributor.author","Seegers, Joachim"],["dc.contributor.author","Zabel, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Luethje, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Vollmann, Dirk"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:38:23Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:38:23Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","Ventricular oversensing remains a significant problem in modern implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) systems. The role of manufacturer-related differences in device-based signal processing on the one hand and sensing lead properties on the other is largely unknown. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate and compare the incidence and mechanisms of ventricular oversensing in single- or dual-chamber ICD systems from Biotronik (BTK), Guidant (GDT), and Medtronic (MDT). In 245 consecutive patients, device function, stored episodes, and lead parameters were evaluated at implant and during 243 +/- 18 days of follow-up. Oversensing occurred in 3.3% of the patients [four T-wave oversensing (TWO), three R-wave double-sensing, and one diaphragmatic myopotentials]. The incidence of ventricular oversensing was generally low if an ICD device and an ICD lead were from one identical manufacturer (BTK: 2/68, GDT: 1/80, and MDT: 1/69; P = 0.67). In the subgroup of ICDs connected to leads from other manufacturers, however, ventricular oversensing was observed in none of 19 GDT and MDT ICDs but in 4 of 9 BTK devices (44.4%, P = 0.012). These four cases of oversensing (three R-wave double-sensing and one TWO) all occurred in BTK ICDs connected to integrated bipolar ICD leads from other manufacturers. Significant manufacturer-related differences exist in the incidence of ventricular oversensing in single- and dual-chamber ICD systems. Biotronik devices connected to integrated bipolar ICD leads from other manufacturers have an increased risk for R-wave double-sensing."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Medtronic; Biotronik"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/europace/euq269"],["dc.identifier.isi","000282429700012"],["dc.identifier.pmid","20663783"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/18757"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Oxford Univ Press"],["dc.relation.issn","1099-5129"],["dc.title","Ventricular oversensing due to manufacturer-related differences in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator signal processing and sensing lead properties"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI PMID PMC WOS2019Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","424"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Heart Rhythm"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","432"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","16"],["dc.contributor.author","Kowallick, Johannes T."],["dc.contributor.author","Staab, Wieland"],["dc.contributor.author","Schuster, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Backhaus, Sören J."],["dc.contributor.author","Weber-Krüger, Mark"],["dc.contributor.author","Bauer, Lukas"],["dc.contributor.author","Sohns, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Lotz, Joachim"],["dc.contributor.author","Hasenfuß, Gerd"],["dc.contributor.author","Lüthje, Lars"],["dc.contributor.author","Zabel, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Bergau, Leonard"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:24:26Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:24:26Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.09.016"],["dc.identifier.issn","1547-5271"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/72245"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Reverse left ventricular structural remodeling after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with preserved left ventricular function: Insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance native T1 mapping"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI