Options
Cardiac resynchronization therapy and atrial overdrive pacing for the treatment of central sleep apnoea
ISSN
1388-9842
Date Issued
2009
Author(s)
Renner, Bernd
Kessels, Roger
Vollmann, Dirk
Gerritse, Bart
Tasci, Selcuk
Schwab, Joerg O.
DOI
10.1093/eurjhf/hfn042
Abstract
Aims The combined therapeutic impact of atrial overdrive pacing (ACIP) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on central steep apnoea (CSA) in chronic heart failure (CHF) so far has not been investigated. We aimed to evaluate the effect of CRT alone and CRT + AOP on CSA in CHF patients and to compare the influence of CRT on CHF between CSA positive and CSA negative patients. Methods and results Thirty patients with CRT indication underwent full night polysomnography, echocardiography, exercise testing, and neurohumoral evaluation before and 3 months after CRT implantation. In CSA positive patients (60%), two additional steep studies were conducted after 3 months of CRT, with CRT alone or CRT + ACIP, in random order. Cardiac resynchronization therapy resulted in significant improvements of NYHA class, left ventricular ejection fraction, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, VO(2)max, and quality of life irrespective of the presence of CSA. Cardiac resynchronization therapy also reduced the central apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) (33.6 +/- 14.3 vs. 23.8 +/- 16.9 h(-1); P < 0.01) and central apnoea index (17.3 +/- 14.1 vs. 10.9 +/- 13.9 h(-1); P < 0.01) without altering steep stages. Cardiac resynchronization therapy with atrial overdrive pacing resulted in a small but significant additional decrease of the central AHI (23.8 +/- 16.9 vs. 21.5 +/- 16.9 h(-1); P < 0.01). Conclusion In this study, CRT significantly improved CSA without altering sleep stages. Cardiac resynchronization therapy with atrial. overdrive pacing resulted in a significant but minor additional improvement of CSA. Positive effects of CRT were irrespective of the presence of CSA.