Wübker, Marieke

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","1427"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Frontiers in Psychology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","8"],["dc.contributor.author","Fink, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Wübker, Marieke"],["dc.contributor.author","Ostner, Julia"],["dc.contributor.author","Butovskaya, Marina L."],["dc.contributor.author","Mezentseva, Anna"],["dc.contributor.author","Muñoz Reyes, José Antonio"],["dc.contributor.author","Sela, Yael"],["dc.contributor.author","Shackelford, Todd K."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-02-08T08:44:51Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-02-08T08:44:51Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Previous research documents that men and women can accurately judge male physical strength from gait, but also that the sexes differ in attractiveness judgments of strong and weak male walkers. Women's (but not men's) attractiveness assessments of strong male walkers are higher than for weak male walkers. Here, we extend this research to assessments of strong and weak male walkers in Chile, Germany, and Russia. Men and women judged videos of virtual characters, animated with the walk movements of motion-captured men, on strength and attractiveness. In two countries (Germany and Russia), these videos were additionally presented at 70% (slower) and 130% (faster) of their original speed. Stronger walkers were judged to be stronger and more attractive than weak walkers, and this effect was independent of country (but not sex). Women tended to provide higher attractiveness judgments to strong walkers, and men tended to provide higher attractiveness judgments to weak walkers. In addition, German and Russian participants rated strong walkers most attractive at slow and fast speed. Thus, across countries men and women can assess male strength from gait, although they tended to differ in attractiveness assessments of strong and weak male walkers. Attractiveness assessments of male gait may be influenced by society-specific emphasis on male physical strength."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2017"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01427"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28878720"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/14602"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/12049"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.intern","In goescholar not merged with http://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/14604 but duplicate"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.publisher","Frontiers Media S.A."],["dc.relation.eissn","1664-1078"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.access","openAccess"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject.ddc","530"],["dc.title","Cross-Cultural Investigation of Male Gait Perception in Relation to Physical Strength and Speed"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","190068"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Royal Society Open Science"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","6"],["dc.contributor.author","Kulke, Louisa"],["dc.contributor.author","Wübker, Marieke"],["dc.contributor.author","Rakoczy, Hannes"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-12T06:44:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-12T06:44:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.description.abstract","Recently, Theory of Mind (ToM) research has been revolutionized by new methods. Eye-tracking studies measuring subjects' looking times or anticipatory looking have suggested that implicit and automatic forms of ToM develop much earlier in ontogeny than traditionally assumed and continue to operate outside of subjects’ awareness throughout the lifespan. However, the reliability of these implicit methods has recently been put into question by an increasing number of non-replications. What remains unclear from these accumulating non-replication findings, though, is whether they present true negatives (there is no robust phenomenon of automatic ToM) or false ones (automatic ToM is real but difficult to tap). In order to address these questions, the current study implemented conceptual replications of influential anticipatory looking ToM tasks with a new variation in the stimuli. In two separate preregistered studies, we used increasingly realistic stimuli and controlled for potential confounds. Even with these more realistic stimuli, previous results could not be replicated. Rather, the anticipatory looking pattern found here remained largely compatible with more parsimonious explanations. In conclusion, the reality and robustness of automatic ToM remains controversial."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1098/rsos.190068"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/16268"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/61469"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","2054-5703"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0"],["dc.title","Is implicit Theory of Mind real but hard to detect? Testing adults with different stimulus materials"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]