Nagel, Jonas

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","754"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","11"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Health Psychology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","763"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","40"],["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Jonas"],["dc.contributor.author","Chavanon, Mira-Lynn"],["dc.contributor.author","Binder, Lutz"],["dc.contributor.author","Pieper, Annekatrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Wachter, Rolf"],["dc.contributor.author","Edelmann, Frank"],["dc.contributor.author","Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-01-11T14:05:40Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-01-11T14:05:40Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1037/hea0001128"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/97719"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-507"],["dc.relation.eissn","1930-7810"],["dc.relation.issn","0278-6133"],["dc.title","How family history of premature myocardial infarction affects patients at cardiovascular risk."],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","619"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Women & Health"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","632"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","61"],["dc.contributor.author","Kyaw Tha Tun, Eva"],["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Jonas"],["dc.contributor.author","Bosbach, Alexandra"],["dc.contributor.author","Bock, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Kielblock, Birgit"],["dc.contributor.author","Siegmund-Schultze, Elisabeth"],["dc.contributor.author","Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-08-12T07:45:09Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-08-12T07:45:09Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/03630242.2021.1953208"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/88381"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-448"],["dc.relation.eissn","1541-0331"],["dc.relation.issn","0363-0242"],["dc.title","Telephone-based peer support intervention to reduce depressive symptoms in women with coronary heart disease, a randomized controlled trial in Germany"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","813"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Philosophical Psychology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","836"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","25"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiegmann, Alex"],["dc.contributor.author","Okan, Yasmina"],["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Jonas"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:14:45Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:14:45Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","Explaining moral intuitions is one of the hot topics of recent cognitive science. In the present article we focus on a factor that attracted surprisingly little attention so far, namely the temporal order in which moral scenarios are presented. We argue that previous research points to a systematic pattern of order effects that has been overlooked until now: only judgments of actions that are normally regarded as morally acceptable are susceptible to be affected by the order of presentation, and this in turn is only the case if the dilemma is immediately preceded by a dilemma in which the proposed action was considered as not morally acceptable. We conducted an experiment that largely confirmed this pattern and allowed us to analyze by what individual level responses it was generated. We argue that investigating order effects is necessary for approaching a complete descriptive moral theory. Furthermore, we discuss the implications of these findings for moral philosophy."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/09515089.2011.631995"],["dc.identifier.isi","000311428100002"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/27494"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","0951-5089"],["dc.title","Order effects in moral judgment"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","110857"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Psychosomatic Research"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","157"],["dc.contributor.author","Herrmann-Lingen, C."],["dc.contributor.author","Zelenak, C."],["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, J."],["dc.contributor.author","Bersch, K."],["dc.contributor.author","Wicker, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Herbeck Belnap, B."],["dc.contributor.author","Friede, T."],["dc.contributor.author","Lühmann, D."],["dc.contributor.author","Ousager, J."],["dc.contributor.author","Stock, S."],["dc.contributor.author","Pedersen, S."],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-09-01T09:49:42Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-09-01T09:49:42Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110857"],["dc.identifier.pii","S0022399922001428"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/113505"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-597"],["dc.relation.issn","0022-3999"],["dc.title","Evaluation of a patient-centred biopsychoSocial blended collaborative CAre Pathway for the treatment of multi-morbid Elderly patients – The ESCAPE clinical study"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","237"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","252"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","39"],["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Jonas"],["dc.contributor.author","Waldmann, M. R."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:30:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:30:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","A heavily disputed question of moral philosophy is whether spatial distance between agent and victim is normatively relevant for the degree of obligation to help strangers in need. In this research, we focus on the associated descriptive question whether increased distance does-in fact reduce individuals' sense of helping obligation. One problem with empirically answering this question is that physical proximity is typically confounded with other factors, such as informational directness, shared group membership, or increased efficaciousness. In a series of 5 experiments, we show that distance per se does not influence people's moral intuitions when it is isolated from such confounds. We support our claims with both frequentist and Bayesian statistics. We relate these findings to philosophical arguments concerning the normative relevance of distance and to psychological theories linking distance cues to higher level social cognition. The effects of joint versus separate evaluation paradigms on moral judgments are also discussed."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1037/a0028641"],["dc.identifier.isi","000313478100018"],["dc.identifier.pmid","22686846"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/31358"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Amer Psychological Assoc"],["dc.relation.issn","0278-7393"],["dc.title","Deconfounding Distance Effects in Judgments of Moral Obligation"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","122"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Cognition"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","141"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","177"],["dc.contributor.author","Gerstenberg, Tobias"],["dc.contributor.author","Ullman, Tomer D."],["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Jonas"],["dc.contributor.author","Kleiman-Weiner, Max"],["dc.contributor.author","Lagnado, David A."],["dc.contributor.author","Tenenbaum, Joshua B."],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:23:11Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:23:11Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.019"],["dc.identifier.issn","0010-0277"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/71864"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Lucky or clever? From expectations to responsibility judgments"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","e0198249"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","PLoS One"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","13"],["dc.contributor.author","Flatau, Laura"],["dc.contributor.author","Reitt, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Duttge, Gunnar"],["dc.contributor.author","Lenk, Christian"],["dc.contributor.author","Zoll, Barbara"],["dc.contributor.author","Poser, Wolfgang"],["dc.contributor.author","Weber, Alexandra"],["dc.contributor.author","Heilbronner, Urs"],["dc.contributor.author","Rietschel, Marcella"],["dc.contributor.author","Strohmaier, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Kesberg, Rebekka"],["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Jonas"],["dc.contributor.author","Schulze, Thomas G."],["dc.contributor.editor","DeAngelis, Margaret M."],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:42:07Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:42:07Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1371/journal.pone.0198249"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1932-6203"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/15687"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/77816"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.rights","CC BY 4.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],["dc.title","Genomic information and a person’s right not to know: A closer look at variations in hypothetical informational preferences in a German sample"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","134"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","141"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","19"],["dc.contributor.author","Bosselmann, Lena"],["dc.contributor.author","Fangauf, Stella V."],["dc.contributor.author","Herbeck Belnap, Birgit"],["dc.contributor.author","Chavanon, Mira-Lynn"],["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Jonas"],["dc.contributor.author","Neitzel, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Schertz, Anna"],["dc.contributor.author","Hummers, Eva"],["dc.contributor.author","Wachter, Rolf"],["dc.contributor.author","Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:38:33Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:38:33Z"],["dc.date.issued","2020-02"],["dc.description.abstract","Background: Risk factor control is essential in limiting the progression of coronary heart disease, but the necessary active patient involvement is often difficult to realise, especially in patients suffering psychosocial risk factors (e.g. distress). Blended collaborative care has been shown as an effective treatment addition, in which a (non-physician) care manager supports patients in implementing and sustaining lifestyle changes, follows-up on patients, and integrates care across providers, targeting both, somatic and psychosocial risk factors. Aims: The aim of this study was to test the feasibility, acceptance and effect of a six-month blended collaborative care intervention in Germany. Methods: For our randomised controlled pilot study with a crossover design we recruited coronary heart disease patients with ⩾1 insufficiently controlled cardiac risk factors and randomised them to either immediate blended collaborative care intervention (immediate intervention group, n=20) or waiting control (waiting control group, n=20). Results: Participation rate in the intervention phase was 67% (n=40), and participants reported high satisfaction (M=1.63, standard deviation=0.69; scale 1 (very high) to 5 (very low)). The number of risk factors decreased significantly from baseline to six months in the immediate intervention group (t(60)=3.07, p=0.003), but not in the waiting control group t(60)=−0.29, p=0.77). Similarly, at the end of their intervention following the six-month waiting period, the waiting control group also showed a significant reduction of risk factors (t(60)=3.88, p\\u0026lt;0.001). Conclusion: This study shows that blended collaborative care can be a feasible, accepted and effective addition to standard medical care in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in the German healthcare system."],["dc.description.sponsorship","deutsches zentrum für herz-kreislaufforschung https://doi.org/10.13039/100010447"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1177/1474515119880062"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1873-1953"],["dc.identifier.issn","1474-5151"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/77362"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.publisher","SAGE Publications"],["dc.relation.eissn","1873-1953"],["dc.relation.issn","1474-5151"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Allgemeinmedizin"],["dc.title","Blended collaborative care in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease improves risk factor control: Results of a randomised feasibility study"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","184"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Thinking & Reasoning"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","208"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","22"],["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Jonas"],["dc.contributor.author","Waldmann, M. R."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:15:40Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:15:40Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","Modern technological means allow for meaningful interaction across arbitrary distances, while human morality evolved in environments in which individuals needed to be spatially close in order to interact. We investigate how people integrate knowledge about modern technology with their ancestral moral dispositions to help relieve nearby suffering. Our first study establishes that spatial proximity between an agent's means of helping and the victims increases people's judgement of helping obligations, even if the agent is constantly far personally. We then report and meta-analyse 20 experiments elucidating the cognitive mechanisms behind this effect, which include inferences of increased efficaciousness and personal involvement. Implications of our findings for the scientific understanding of ancestral moral dispositions in modern environments are discussed, as well as suggestions for how these insights might be exploited to increase charitable giving. Our meta-analysis provides a practical example for how aggregating across all available data, including failed replication attempts, allows conclusions that could not be supported in single experiments."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/13546783.2015.1114023"],["dc.identifier.isi","000370651800003"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/40857"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1464-0708"],["dc.relation.issn","1354-6783"],["dc.title","On having very long arms: how the availability of technological means affects moral cognition"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","93"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie)"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","109"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","64"],["dc.contributor.author","Nagel, Jonas"],["dc.contributor.author","Rybak, Andrej"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:26:19Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:26:19Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Research on moral judgment often employs bipolar rating scales to assess whether the difference between two contrasted options is judged to be morally relevant. We give an account of how different numbers of response options provided on such scales ( odd vs. even) change the meaning of the test question by communicating different implicit presuppositions. We demonstrate experimentally that these changes can qualitatively affect the moral relevance judgments that subjects express in response to a given judgment problem. Several alternative explanations in terms of trivial measurement distortion are tested and refuted, and we present suggestive evidence as to what kind of factors might be prone to scale effects. The findings underscore that expressed moral judgments are constructed ad hoc and do not necessarily reflect the content of underlying stable moral commitments. We discuss implications for theories and methodology in moral psychology and in judgment and decision-making research more generally."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1027/1618-3169/a000341"],["dc.identifier.isi","000401140400004"],["dc.identifier.pmid","28497721"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/43016"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.publisher","Hogrefe & Huber Publishers"],["dc.relation.issn","2190-5142"],["dc.relation.issn","1618-3169"],["dc.title","Scale Effects in Moral Relevance Assessment How Implicit Presuppositions Communicated by Response Scales Affect Expressed Judgments"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]