Cremer, Stephan

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","18"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","BMC Anesthesiology"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","12"],["dc.contributor.author","Russo, Sebastian Giuseppe"],["dc.contributor.author","Cremer, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Galli, Tamara"],["dc.contributor.author","Eich, Christoph B."],["dc.contributor.author","Braeuer, Anselm"],["dc.contributor.author","Crozier, Thomas A."],["dc.contributor.author","Bauer, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Strack, Micha"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:07:16Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:07:16Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","Background: The i-gel (TM), LMA-Supreme (LMA-S) and Laryngeal Tube Suction-D (LTS-D) are single-use supraglottic airway devices with an inbuilt drainage channel. We compared them with regard to their position in situ as well as to clinical performance data during elective surgery. Methods: Prospective, randomized, comparative study of three groups of 40 elective surgical patients each. Speed of insertion and success rates, leak pressures (LP) at different cuff pressures, dynamic airway compliance, and signs of postoperative airway morbidity were recorded. Fibreoptic evaluation was used to determine the devices' position in situ. Results: Leak pressures were similar (i-gel (TM) 25.9, LMA-S 27.1, LTS-D 24.0 cmH(2)O; the latter two at 60 cmH(2)O cuff pressure) as were insertion times (i-gel (TM) 10, LMA-S 11, LTS-D 14 sec). LP of the LMA-S was higher than that of the LTS-D at lower cuff pressures (p < 0.05). Insertion success rates differed significantly: i-gel (TM) 95%, LMA-S 95%, LTS-D 70% (p < 0.05). The fibreoptically assessed position was more frequently suboptimal with the LTS-D but this was not associated with impaired ventilation. Dynamic airway compliance was highest with the i-gel (TM) and lowest with the LTS-D (p < 0.05). Airway morbidity was more pronounced with the LTS-D (p < 0.01). Conclusion: All devices were suitable for ventilating the patients' lungs during elective surgery."],["dc.description.sponsorship","Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2012"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1186/1471-2253-12-18"],["dc.identifier.isi","000314842600001"],["dc.identifier.pmid","22871204"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/7856"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/25756"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Biomed Central Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1471-2253"],["dc.rights","CC BY 2.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0"],["dc.title","Randomized comparison of the i-gel (TM), the LMA Supreme (TM), and the Laryngeal Tube Suction-D using clinical and fibreoptic assessments in elective patients"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","176"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Pediatric Anesthesia"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","178"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","21"],["dc.contributor.author","Eich, Christoph B."],["dc.contributor.author","Verhagen-Henning, Svenja"],["dc.contributor.author","Roessler, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Cremer, Frederike"],["dc.contributor.author","Cremer, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Strack, Micha"],["dc.contributor.author","Russo, Sebastian Giuseppe"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:59:57Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:59:57Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03489.x"],["dc.identifier.isi","000286000000018"],["dc.identifier.pmid","21210891"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/24030"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Wiley-blackwell Publishing, Inc"],["dc.relation.issn","1155-5645"],["dc.title","Low-dose S-ketamine added to propofol anesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging in children is safe and ensures faster recovery - a prospective evaluation"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.subtype","letter_note"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","212"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Resuscitation"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","218"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","79"],["dc.contributor.author","Nickel, Eike A."],["dc.contributor.author","Timmermann, Arnd"],["dc.contributor.author","Roessler, Markus"],["dc.contributor.author","Cremer, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Russo, Sebastian Giuseppe"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T11:09:46Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T11:09:46Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.description.abstract","Aim of the study: Airway management in an out-of-hospital setting is a critical and demanding skill. Previous studies evaluated the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) as a valuable toot in this area. The LMA CTrach (TM) Laryngeal. Mask Airway (CTrach) may increase intubation success. Therefore, we evaluated the CTrach as the primary toot for airway management in the out-of-hospital setting in adult patients. Methods: From October 2006 until September 2007 EAN and SGR included all patients who needed advanced airway management during out-of-hospital emergency medicine service. Ventilation and intubation has been performed via the CTrach as the primary choice. Before intubation, visualization of the vocal cords was optimized under continuous ventilation via the CTrach. The time needed, manoeuvres to optimize vision, grades of vision and success rates have been documented. Results: 16 patients have been included. Ventilation and intubation via the CTrach was possible in all patients. Ventilation was mostly established in less than 15 s and was established in 15 of 16 (94%) patients at the first attempt. Intubation was successful in 15 of 16 (94%) patients on the first attempt. Visualization of the laryngeal structures was achieved in 69% of patients, while intubation without sight was performed in 31%, respectively. Conclusion: In this study, ventilation and intubation via the CTrach was successful and could be rapidly established in all patients. Our data suggest that the use of the CTrach may be suitable for the out-of-hospital setting as it provides ventilation and facilitates intubation with a very high success rate. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.06.020"],["dc.identifier.isi","000261355700008"],["dc.identifier.pmid","18691800"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/53079"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Ireland Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","0300-9572"],["dc.title","Out-of-hospital airway management with the LMA CTrach (TM)-A prospective evaluation"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1338"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Resuscitation"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1343"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","82"],["dc.contributor.author","Fernandez Castelao, Ezequiel"],["dc.contributor.author","Russo, Sebastian G."],["dc.contributor.author","Cremer, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Strack, Micha"],["dc.contributor.author","Kaminski, Lea"],["dc.contributor.author","Eich, Christoph"],["dc.contributor.author","Timmermann, Arnd"],["dc.contributor.author","Boos, Margarete"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-08-20T07:59:10Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-08-20T07:59:10Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","To evaluate the impact of video-based interactive crisis resource management (CRM) training on no-flow time (NFT) and on proportions of team member verbalisations (TMV) during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Further, to investigate the link between team leader verbalisation accuracy and NFT."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.05.009"],["dc.identifier.pmid","21664757"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/15401"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.eissn","0300-9572"],["dc.title","Positive impact of crisis resource management training on no-flow time and team member verbalisations during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation"],["dc.title.subtitle","A randomised controlled trial"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]