Options
Oehmichen, Jana
Loading...
Preferred name
Oehmichen, Jana
Official Name
Oehmichen, Jana
Alternative Name
Oehmichen, J.
Main Affiliation
Now showing 1 - 10 of 18
2017Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1050"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Management Studies"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1078"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","54"],["dc.contributor.author","Oehmichen, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Braun, Daniel"],["dc.contributor.author","Wolff, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Yoshikawa, Toru"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-12-08T12:27:58Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-12-08T12:27:58Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/joms.12275"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1467-6486"],["dc.identifier.issn","0022-2380"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/95513"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-476"],["dc.relation.eissn","1467-6486"],["dc.relation.issn","0022-2380"],["dc.rights.uri","http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor"],["dc.title","When Elites Forget Their Duties: The Double‐Edged Sword of Prestigious Directors on Boards"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2016Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","17"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of International Management"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","28"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","22"],["dc.contributor.author","Oehmichen, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Puck, Jonas"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:17:33Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:17:33Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","Whereas researchers have provided profound empirical evidence for the direct relationship between subsidiary embeddedness and subsidiary performance, we intend to investigate the dependence of this relationship on firm-specific contingency factors. Specifically, we propose that the effects of internal and external embeddedness on performance are contingent on ownership mode and the past change of such mode. We find a positive moderating effect of changes in ownership mode on the relationship between external and internal embeddedness and subsidiary performance. The empirical results support our reasoning that dynamic learning routines realized in situations of organizational change positively affect the efficacy for external and internal resource access for subsidiaries. The contingency perspective of our study provides further support for IB research to avoid one-size-fits all statements but rather to consider the volatile internal and external parameters that determine MNEs' business. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.intman.2015.11.002"],["dc.identifier.isi","000372310800003"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/41250"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Science Bv"],["dc.relation.issn","1873-0620"],["dc.relation.issn","1075-4253"],["dc.title","Embeddedness, Ownership Mode and Dynamics, and the Performance of MNE Subsidiaries"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI WOS2017Review [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","283"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","The International Journal of Human Resource Management"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","306"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","28"],["dc.contributor.author","Oehmichen, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Heyden, Mariano L. M."],["dc.contributor.author","Georgakakis, Dimitrios"],["dc.contributor.author","Volberda, Henk W."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:28:53Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:28:53Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","We examine the relation between boards of directors' knowledge heterogeneity and organizational ambidexterity (OA) (i.e. simultaneous exploration and exploitation) in knowledge-intensive firms (KIFs). Although the literature on OA has started to emphasize its antecedents, the role of the board remains unaddressed. This is an important omission, as boards have become increasingly involved in strategy-making. In turn, studies on boards have looked at their influence on either exploration- or exploitation-type strategies. Yet, KIFs particularly need to balance both exploration and exploitation to renew their knowledge base. We draw on knowledge-based perspectives to disentangle the benefits and costs of board knowledge heterogeneity for driving OA in KIFs. Our empirical analysis based on a longitudinal panel of UK pharmaceutical firms provides support for our hypothesized U-shaped relation. Our findings suggest that the benefits of knowledge heterogeneity only outweigh the costs beyond a particular threshold. Overall, our theoretical approach and allied findings advance the literature by introducing boundary conditions to the resource provision role of boards in KIFs. We discuss contributions for organizational learning, strategic leadership, and human resource management. We conclude with implications for theory and practice, as well as key opportunities for future research."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/09585192.2016.1244904"],["dc.identifier.isi","000395088200003"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/43527"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.publisher","Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1466-4399"],["dc.relation.issn","0958-5192"],["dc.title","Boards of directors and organizational ambidexterity in knowledge-intensive firms"],["dc.type","review"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI WOS2018Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","451"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Accounting Review"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","482"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","28"],["dc.contributor.author","Firk, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Maybuechen, Franz"],["dc.contributor.author","Oehmichen, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Wolff, Michael"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:14:56Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:14:56Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/09638180.2018.1492947"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1468-4497"],["dc.identifier.issn","0963-8180"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/74676"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Value-based Management and Merger & Acquisition Returns: A Multi-level Contingency Model"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2018Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","452"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of World Business"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","462"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","53"],["dc.contributor.author","Ahrens, Carolin"],["dc.contributor.author","Oehmichen, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Wolff, Michael"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T15:20:10Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T15:20:10Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.jwb.2018.01.002"],["dc.identifier.issn","1090-9516"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/72578"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Expatriates as influencers in global work arrangements: Their impact on foreign-subsidiary employees’ ESOP participation"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2014Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1179"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","International Business Review"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1192"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","23"],["dc.contributor.author","Huettenbrink, Alexander"],["dc.contributor.author","Oehmichen, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Rapp, Marc Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Wolff, Michael"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:32:23Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:32:23Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Are there country-level differences in the use of pay-for-performance in executive compensation contracts? We investigate how formal country-level institutions affect pay-for-performance directly and if institutions have a moderating effect on the relation between ownership structure and pay-for-performance contracts. Based on agency theory arguments, we show that substitutionary and complementary relations are conceivable, for the direct and the moderating effect. We conduct an empirical analysis based on 2766 firm-year observations for the years 2005-2008. Our empirical results show that whereas strong shareholder protection substitutes pay-for-performance, disclosure requirements complement pay-for-performance. Additionally, strong shareholder protection complements the effect of concentrated ownership on pay-for-performance while disclosure requirements substitute effects of ownership concentration. Overall, our results provide evidence for the relevance of formal institutions as determinants of executive compensation contracts. Additionally, our results indicate the general complexity of integrating institutions and internal governance mechanisms. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.04.002"],["dc.identifier.isi","000343391300013"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/31748"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Science Bv"],["dc.relation.issn","1873-6149"],["dc.relation.issn","0969-5931"],["dc.title","Pay-for-performance - Does one size fit all? A multi-country study of Europe and the United States"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI WOS2022Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","690"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Business Research"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","702"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","144"],["dc.contributor.author","Hennig, Jan C."],["dc.contributor.author","Oehmichen, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Steinberg, Philip J."],["dc.contributor.author","Heigermoser, Judith"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-06-01T09:40:16Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-06-01T09:40:16Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.019"],["dc.identifier.pii","S0148296322001357"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/108687"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-572"],["dc.relation.issn","0148-2963"],["dc.rights.uri","https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/"],["dc.title","Determinants of common ownership: Exploring an information-based and a competition-based perspective in a global context"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2017Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1023"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Human Resource Management"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1037"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","57"],["dc.contributor.author","Oehmichen, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Wolff, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Zschoche, Ulrike"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-12-08T12:30:34Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-12-08T12:30:34Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1002/hrm.21885"],["dc.identifier.issn","0090-4848"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/96482"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-476"],["dc.relation.issn","0090-4848"],["dc.rights.uri","http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1"],["dc.title","Employee participation in employee stock ownership plans: Cross-level interaction effects of institutions and workgroup behavior"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2021Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1800"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Management Studies"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1831"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","58"],["dc.contributor.author","Firk, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Hanelt, André"],["dc.contributor.author","Oehmichen, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Wolff, Michael"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-12-08T12:27:58Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-12-08T12:27:58Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/joms.12718"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/95514"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-476"],["dc.relation.eissn","1467-6486"],["dc.relation.issn","0022-2380"],["dc.rights.uri","http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/"],["dc.title","Chief Digital Officers: An Analysis of the Presence of a Centralized Digital Transformation Role"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2017Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","645"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Strategic Management Journal"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","656"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","38"],["dc.contributor.author","Oehmichen, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Schrapp, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Wolff, Michael"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:26:37Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:26:37Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","Research summary: We analyze the effects of board industry expertise on corporate strategic change and the moderating role of institutional quality. We suggest that country-level contingency factors mitigate the effect of experienced boards on strategy formation by providing alternative sources of information and control in strategic matters. We develop institutional quality as institutional information provision and institutional control provision to test our hypotheses on a sample of firms from MSCI Europe and the S&P 500. Our findings confirm that industry expertise is a salient driver of strategic change across countries. The strength of the effect, however, depends on the institutional quality. We submit that weak institutions require greater board industry expertise as an alternative channel of information and control. Managerial summary: This study provides new empirical evidence that experience in the firms' industries enables directors to increase strategic change. Our findings show that this effect is even stronger in countries with weak regulatory environments. We hereby provide guidance for multiple stakeholders. First, shareholders seeking a more active adjustment of their firms' strategies may want to compose boards that leverage such experienced directors. Second, directors can use their industry experience to control and to challenge managers better to move beyond the status quo. Third, managers lacking access to information on potential strategic change can use such experienced directors for strategic advice and as a source of information. Overall, we add to the understanding of the corporate board's role in shaping strategy and the influence of weak regulations. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1002/smj.2513"],["dc.identifier.isi","000397155100009"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/43079"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.publisher","Wiley"],["dc.relation.issn","1097-0266"],["dc.relation.issn","0143-2095"],["dc.title","WHO NEEDS EXPERTS MOST? BOARD INDUSTRY EXPERTISE AND STRATEGIC CHANGE-A CONTINGENCY PERSPECTIVE"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI WOS