Oehmichen, Jana

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1050"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Management Studies"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1078"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","54"],["dc.contributor.author","Oehmichen, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Braun, Daniel"],["dc.contributor.author","Wolff, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Yoshikawa, Toru"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-12-08T12:27:58Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-12-08T12:27:58Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/joms.12275"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1467-6486"],["dc.identifier.issn","0022-2380"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/95513"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-476"],["dc.relation.eissn","1467-6486"],["dc.relation.issn","0022-2380"],["dc.rights.uri","http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor"],["dc.title","When Elites Forget Their Duties: The Double‐Edged Sword of Prestigious Directors on Boards"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","17"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of International Management"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","28"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","22"],["dc.contributor.author","Oehmichen, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Puck, Jonas"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:17:33Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:17:33Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.description.abstract","Whereas researchers have provided profound empirical evidence for the direct relationship between subsidiary embeddedness and subsidiary performance, we intend to investigate the dependence of this relationship on firm-specific contingency factors. Specifically, we propose that the effects of internal and external embeddedness on performance are contingent on ownership mode and the past change of such mode. We find a positive moderating effect of changes in ownership mode on the relationship between external and internal embeddedness and subsidiary performance. The empirical results support our reasoning that dynamic learning routines realized in situations of organizational change positively affect the efficacy for external and internal resource access for subsidiaries. The contingency perspective of our study provides further support for IB research to avoid one-size-fits all statements but rather to consider the volatile internal and external parameters that determine MNEs' business. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.intman.2015.11.002"],["dc.identifier.isi","000372310800003"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/41250"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Science Bv"],["dc.relation.issn","1873-0620"],["dc.relation.issn","1075-4253"],["dc.title","Embeddedness, Ownership Mode and Dynamics, and the Performance of MNE Subsidiaries"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","283"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","The International Journal of Human Resource Management"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","306"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","28"],["dc.contributor.author","Oehmichen, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Heyden, Mariano L. M."],["dc.contributor.author","Georgakakis, Dimitrios"],["dc.contributor.author","Volberda, Henk W."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:28:53Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:28:53Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.description.abstract","We examine the relation between boards of directors' knowledge heterogeneity and organizational ambidexterity (OA) (i.e. simultaneous exploration and exploitation) in knowledge-intensive firms (KIFs). Although the literature on OA has started to emphasize its antecedents, the role of the board remains unaddressed. This is an important omission, as boards have become increasingly involved in strategy-making. In turn, studies on boards have looked at their influence on either exploration- or exploitation-type strategies. Yet, KIFs particularly need to balance both exploration and exploitation to renew their knowledge base. We draw on knowledge-based perspectives to disentangle the benefits and costs of board knowledge heterogeneity for driving OA in KIFs. Our empirical analysis based on a longitudinal panel of UK pharmaceutical firms provides support for our hypothesized U-shaped relation. Our findings suggest that the benefits of knowledge heterogeneity only outweigh the costs beyond a particular threshold. Overall, our theoretical approach and allied findings advance the literature by introducing boundary conditions to the resource provision role of boards in KIFs. We discuss contributions for organizational learning, strategic leadership, and human resource management. We conclude with implications for theory and practice, as well as key opportunities for future research."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/09585192.2016.1244904"],["dc.identifier.isi","000395088200003"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/43527"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","PUB_WoS_Import"],["dc.publisher","Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd"],["dc.relation.issn","1466-4399"],["dc.relation.issn","0958-5192"],["dc.title","Boards of directors and organizational ambidexterity in knowledge-intensive firms"],["dc.type","review"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","451"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Accounting Review"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","482"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","28"],["dc.contributor.author","Firk, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Maybuechen, Franz"],["dc.contributor.author","Oehmichen, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Wolff, Michael"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:14:56Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:14:56Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1080/09638180.2018.1492947"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1468-4497"],["dc.identifier.issn","0963-8180"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/74676"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Value-based Management and Merger & Acquisition Returns: A Multi-level Contingency Model"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","95"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","125"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","82"],["dc.contributor.author","Oehmichen, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Rapp, Marc Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Wolff, Michael A."],["dc.contributor.editor","Beham, Barbara"],["dc.contributor.editor","Straub, Caroline"],["dc.contributor.editor","Schwalbach, Joachim"],["dc.date.accessioned","2014-08-20T09:54:16Z"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-10-27T13:19:52Z"],["dc.date.available","2014-08-20T09:54:16Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-10-27T13:19:52Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","In this paper we want to investigate the impact of company owners on the low percentage of women on management boards and whether they are attempting to increase this percentage. After analysing whether ownership concentration influences the number ofwomen on management boards we distinguish between different types of owners.We find that ownership concentration has no effect on the presence of women on German management boards, we show however that institutional and individual owners have a significantly positive effect. Classifying institutional owners into national and foreign owners illustrates that foreign investors are the primary driver of the positive effect within the class of institutional owners; the presence of national investors that are strongly influenced by the national banking system does not show any effect. Our analyses are based on 15,976 management board member positions from 2000 to 2007 in approximately 600 German-listed companies."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/978-3-8349-3869-5_6"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s11573-011-0541-0"],["dc.identifier.fs","594628"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/10630"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/91918"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Migrated from goescholar"],["dc.publisher","Gabler Verlag"],["dc.publisher.place","Wiesbaden"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Managing Diversity in Organizations"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät"],["dc.rights.access","openAccess"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject","Management board · Gender ·Women · Corporate governance"],["dc.title","Women on German management boards"],["dc.title.subtitle","How ownership structure affects management board diversity"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","452"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of World Business"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","462"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","53"],["dc.contributor.author","Ahrens, Carolin"],["dc.contributor.author","Oehmichen, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Wolff, Michael"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T15:20:10Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T15:20:10Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.jwb.2018.01.002"],["dc.identifier.issn","1090-9516"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/72578"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Expatriates as influencers in global work arrangements: Their impact on foreign-subsidiary employees’ ESOP participation"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1179"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","International Business Review"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1192"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","23"],["dc.contributor.author","Huettenbrink, Alexander"],["dc.contributor.author","Oehmichen, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Rapp, Marc Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Wolff, Michael"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:32:23Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:32:23Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","Are there country-level differences in the use of pay-for-performance in executive compensation contracts? We investigate how formal country-level institutions affect pay-for-performance directly and if institutions have a moderating effect on the relation between ownership structure and pay-for-performance contracts. Based on agency theory arguments, we show that substitutionary and complementary relations are conceivable, for the direct and the moderating effect. We conduct an empirical analysis based on 2766 firm-year observations for the years 2005-2008. Our empirical results show that whereas strong shareholder protection substitutes pay-for-performance, disclosure requirements complement pay-for-performance. Additionally, strong shareholder protection complements the effect of concentrated ownership on pay-for-performance while disclosure requirements substitute effects of ownership concentration. Overall, our results provide evidence for the relevance of formal institutions as determinants of executive compensation contracts. Additionally, our results indicate the general complexity of integrating institutions and internal governance mechanisms. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.04.002"],["dc.identifier.isi","000343391300013"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/31748"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Elsevier Science Bv"],["dc.relation.issn","1873-6149"],["dc.relation.issn","0969-5931"],["dc.title","Pay-for-performance - Does one size fit all? A multi-country study of Europe and the United States"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","690"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Business Research"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","702"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","144"],["dc.contributor.author","Hennig, Jan C."],["dc.contributor.author","Oehmichen, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Steinberg, Philip J."],["dc.contributor.author","Heigermoser, Judith"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-06-01T09:40:16Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-06-01T09:40:16Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.019"],["dc.identifier.pii","S0148296322001357"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/108687"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-572"],["dc.relation.issn","0148-2963"],["dc.rights.uri","https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/"],["dc.title","Determinants of common ownership: Exploring an information-based and a competition-based perspective in a global context"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1023"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Human Resource Management"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1037"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","57"],["dc.contributor.author","Oehmichen, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Wolff, Michael"],["dc.contributor.author","Zschoche, Ulrike"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-12-08T12:30:34Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-12-08T12:30:34Z"],["dc.date.issued","2017"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1002/hrm.21885"],["dc.identifier.issn","0090-4848"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/96482"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-476"],["dc.relation.issn","0090-4848"],["dc.rights.uri","http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1"],["dc.title","Employee participation in employee stock ownership plans: Cross-level interaction effects of institutions and workgroup behavior"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1800"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Management Studies"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1831"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","58"],["dc.contributor.author","Firk, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Hanelt, André"],["dc.contributor.author","Oehmichen, Jana"],["dc.contributor.author","Wolff, Michael"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-12-08T12:27:58Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-12-08T12:27:58Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/joms.12718"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/95514"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-476"],["dc.relation.eissn","1467-6486"],["dc.relation.issn","0022-2380"],["dc.rights.uri","http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/"],["dc.title","Chief Digital Officers: An Analysis of the Presence of a Centralized Digital Transformation Role"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]