Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
  • 2015Journal Article Research Paper
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Berichte über Landwirtschaft"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","93"],["dc.contributor.author","Bruemmer, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Hamm, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Marggraf, Rainer"],["dc.contributor.author","Moeller, Detlev"],["dc.contributor.author","Musshoff, Oliver"],["dc.contributor.author","Qaim, Matin"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.contributor.author","Theuvsen, Ludwig"],["dc.contributor.author","von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Wollni, Meike"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:53:50Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:53:50Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","In 2014, the annual conference of the German Society of Economic and Social Sciences in Agriculture was jointly organized by the University of Gottingen and the University of Kas-sel. Against the background of various challenges faced by agriculture, the conference ad-dressed the question of recent theories and methods available and how they may benefit agricultural economics and social sciences research. The present article provides an overview of the conference program and summarizes the most important results and discussions. The conference started with two pre-conference activities which dealt with animal welfare and gravity models in international agricultural trade. The plenary session addressed the overall topic of the conference, i.e., new methods and challenges relevant for economic and social sciences in agriculture. During the conference, 36 submitted papers and 28 poster presentations provided insight into the overall topic from different perspectives. Also, state-of-the-art and future perspectives of evolutionary approaches in agricultural economics and social sciences as well as the most recent Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) reform were discussed in two self-organized sessions. Finally, a panel discussion at the end of the conference gave representatives from politics and science the opportunity to discuss the situation of agricultural research situated between methodological excellence and public perceptions. Most of the contributions summarized in this article are published in the conference proceedings (\"Schriften der Gesellschaft fur Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.\", Volume 50). We conclude that, in 2014, the Annual Conference of the German Society of Economic and Social Sciences in Agriculture again attracted much attention and provided convincing results and discussions. It impressively illustrated the extent to which new theories and methods are already being applied in agricultural economics and social sciences research today. The numerous discussions also revealed that this is a very dynamic field and that interesting developments can be expected in the future. Emphasis shall be put on understanding the many challenges which agriculture faces and on pointing out potential solutions or future perspectives. After all, a core objective of the economic and social sciences of agriculture is to not only do methodologically excellent work but to also address the manifold expectations of society."],["dc.identifier.isi","000359075800004"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/36415"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.relation.issn","2196-5099"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung"],["dc.title","New Theories and Methods in Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences Report on the 54th Annual Conference of the German Society of Economic and Social Sciences in Agriculture from September 17 to 19, 2014"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details WOS
  • 2013Working Paper
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.seriesnr","1304"],["dc.contributor.author","Lakner, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Holst, Carsten"],["dc.contributor.author","Brümmer, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Theuvsen, Ludwig"],["dc.contributor.author","Musshoff, Oliver"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-01-16T14:05:07Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-01-16T14:05:07Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/11666"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.publisher","Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung"],["dc.publisher.place","Göttingen"],["dc.relation.crisseries","Diskussionsbeiträge (Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung Göttingen)"],["dc.title","Zahlungen für Landwirte an gesellschaftliche Leistungen koppeln! - Ein Kommentar zum aktuellen Stand der EU-Agrarreform"],["dc.type","working_paper"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details
  • 2015Journal Article Research Paper
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Berichte über Landwirtschaft - Zeitschrift für Agrarpolitik und Landwirtschaft"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","23"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","93"],["dc.contributor.author","Brümmer, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Hamm, Ulrich"],["dc.contributor.author","Marggraf, Rainer"],["dc.contributor.author","Möller, Detlev"],["dc.contributor.author","Musshoff, Oliver"],["dc.contributor.author","Qaim, Matin"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.contributor.author","Theuvsen, Ludwig"],["dc.contributor.author","Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan von"],["dc.contributor.author","Wollni, Meike"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-01-16T11:20:59Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-01-16T11:20:59Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","Die Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V. wurde 2014 gemeinsam von der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen und der Universität Kassel ausgerichtet. Vor dem Hintergrund vielfältiger Herausforderungen für die Agrarwirtschaft, widmete sich die Tagung der Frage, welche neuen Theorien und Methoden den Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaus zur Verfügung stehen und welchen Nutzen sie für die agrarökonomische Forschung bieten. Der vorliegende Artikel gibt einen Überblick über das Programm der Tagung und subsumiert die wichtigsten Ergebnisse. Zu Beginn der Jahrestagung fanden zwei Prä-Konferenz-Aktivitäten statt, die sich mit dem Thema Tierwohl zwischen Markt und Moral und mit Gravity-Modellen im internationalen Agrarhandel beschäftigten. Die anschließende Plenarveranstaltung widmete sich dem allgemeinen Oberthema der Konferenz, also den neuen Methoden und Herausforderungen, die für die Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaus von Bedeutung sind. In 36 Arbeitsgruppenvorträgen und 28 Posterpräsentationen wurde das Oberthema der Tagung aus verschiedenen Perspektiven beleuchtet. Zwei selbstorganisierte Arbeitsgruppen lieferten außerdem Beiträge zu evolutorischen Ansätzen in den Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaus und zur Reform der Gemeinsamen Agrarpolitik (GAP). In der Podiumsdiskussion, die den Abschluss der Jahrestagung bildete, diskutierten Vertreter aus Politik und Wissenschaft über die Situation der Agrarforschung zwischen methodischer Exzellenz und gesellschaftlicher Wahrnehmung. Ein Tagungsband, der die Mehrzahl der in diesem Artikel zusammengefassten Beiträge enthält, wird als Band 50 der \"Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.\" veröffentlicht. Zusammenfassend lässt sich sagen, dass sich die GEWISOLA-Tagung auch 2014 wieder großer Beliebtheit erfreute und mit interessanten Ergebnissen und Diskussionen überzeugte. Die Tagung hat eindrücklich gezeigt, zu welch großem Ausmaß neue Theorien und Methoden bereits heute in den Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues angewendet werden. In den vielfältigen Diskussionen wurde aber auch deutlich, dass es sich um ein sehr dynamisches Feld handelt, wo in Zukunft weitere interessante Entwicklungen zu erwarten sind. Dabei steht im Mittelpunkt, die Vielzahl von Herausforderungen, denen sich die Agrarwirtschaft gegenüber sieht, besser zu verstehen und Lösungsansätze oder zukünftige Perspektiven aufzuzeigen. Nicht zuletzt ist es ein Kernanliegen der Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues, nicht nur methodisch exzellente Arbeit zu leisten, sondern darüber hinaus auch die vielfältigen Ansprüche der Gesellschaft zu berücksichtigen."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.12767/buel.v93i2.76"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/11661"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung"],["dc.title","Neue Theorien und Methoden in den Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaus"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2006Journal Article Discussion
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","289"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Berichte über Landwirtschaft"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","313"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","84"],["dc.contributor.author","Bahrs, Enno"],["dc.contributor.author","von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Spiller, Achim"],["dc.contributor.author","Theuvsen, Ludwig"],["dc.contributor.author","Voget, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","Zeller, Manfred"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:27:00Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:27:00Z"],["dc.date.issued","2006"],["dc.description.abstract","This article provides a general resume of four plenary speeches, 45 presentations and a final panel discussion held at the 451 annual meeting of the Gesellschaft fur Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e. V. (Society for Economic and Social Sciences in Agriculture) (GEWISOLA), that took place in Gottingen from October 5(th) to 7(th), 2005. The conference topic was: 'Enterprises in the Agri-Rural Sector Facing New Challenges'. From an agricultural economic perspective, the attempt was made to give answers to questions concerning strategies chosen by agricultural and rural enterprises to cope with challenges resulting from diverse pressures to adjust as well as to respond to increasing opportunities opened up by globalisation. The individual contributions focused on the following priority areas: current developments in the agricultural sector, markets and policies, producers and consumers in the agricultural sector and in society, enterprises in a dynamic environment and, last but not least, the financing of the agricultural policy of the EU."],["dc.identifier.isi","000240707200006"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/30435"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","W Kohlhammer Gmbh, I A Jochen Krauss"],["dc.relation.issn","0005-9080"],["dc.title","Enterprises in the agri-rural sector facing new challenges - Report on the 45th Annual Meeting of the Society for Economic and Social Sciences in Agriculture (GEWISOLA) in Gottingen in 2005"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dc.type.subtype","letter_note"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details WOS
  • 2010Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","502"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","BERICHTE UBER LANDWIRTSCHAFT"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","512"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","88"],["dc.contributor.author","Zschache, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Theuvsen, Ludwig"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T08:36:02Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T08:36:02Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","Public interpretations in the discourse on bioenergy - A qualitative media analysis Bioenergy production in Germany and elsewhere has developed rapidly in recent years. This astonishing surge was boosted by a wide range of political support and subsidies at both EU and national level as part of a general strategy directed at encouraging the use of renewable energies. However, there has been increasing criticism of the intensive production and energetic use of biomass in the last three years. In this context, major risks are seen with regard to environmental sustainability and global food security. The issue is, however, multilayered and characterised by a great variety of competing interests, opinions and perceptions. From the point-of-view of democratic theory, future policies will have to take into account public opinion on the opportunities and risks associated with bioenergy if they are to acquire democratic legitimacy. The analysis of mass media discourses can generate valuable insights into perceptions and interpretations in the public realm. To illustrate this, we present the results of a qualitative analysis of the media debate on bioenergy in leading German newspapers. The findings reveal a broad spectrum of interpretative views on bioenergy which compete with each other for political influence."],["dc.identifier.isi","000286790600008"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/18212"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","W Kohlhammer Gmbh, I A Jochen Krauss"],["dc.relation.issn","0005-9080"],["dc.title","Public interpretations in the discourse on bioenergy - A qualitative media analysis"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details WOS
  • 2012Working Paper
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.seriesnr","1208"],["dc.contributor.author","Lakner, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","Brümmer, Bernhard"],["dc.contributor.author","von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Heß, Jürgen"],["dc.contributor.author","Isselstein, Johannes"],["dc.contributor.author","Liebe, Ulf"],["dc.contributor.author","Marggraf, R."],["dc.contributor.author","Musshoff, Oliver"],["dc.contributor.author","Theuvsen, Ludwig"],["dc.contributor.author","Tscharntke, Teja"],["dc.contributor.author","Westphal, Catrin"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiese, Gerlinde"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-01-16T14:50:37Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-01-16T14:50:37Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.4126/98-004590977"],["dc.identifier.issn","1865-2697"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/11670"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.publisher","Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung"],["dc.publisher.place","Göttingen"],["dc.relation.crisseries","Diskussionsbeiträge (Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung Göttingen)"],["dc.title","Der Kommissionsvorschlag zur GAP-Reform 2013: Aus Sicht von Göttinger und Witzenhäuser Agrarwissenschaftler(inne)n"],["dc.type","working_paper"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI
  • 2012Journal Article
    [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","707"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Review of Agricultural Economics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","728"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","39"],["dc.contributor.author","Hess, Sebastian"],["dc.contributor.author","von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan"],["dc.contributor.author","Zschache, Ulrike"],["dc.contributor.author","Theuvsen, Ludwig"],["dc.contributor.author","Kleinschmit, Daniela"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:06:55Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:06:55Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.description.abstract","The regulation of seasonal foreign farm labour (SFFL) in Germany distorts market outcomes and produces no significant benefits for any of the affected groups. Analysis of the media discourse on this regulation indicates that its persistence can be attributed to the political sensitivity of unemployment and related issues in Germany. To reach these conclusions, we propose a new method for the analysis of discourse data based on a Poisson change point model, and demonstrate that exogenous factors such as unemployment in Germany can explain structural breaks in the media discourse on SFFL in Germany."],["dc.description.sponsorship","German Research Foundation (DFG) [TH 736/9-1]"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1093/erae/jbr057"],["dc.identifier.isi","000307172000008"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/25665"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Oxford Univ Press"],["dc.relation.issn","1464-3618"],["dc.relation.issn","0165-1587"],["dc.title","Explaining the puzzling persistence of restrictions on seasonal farm labour in Germany"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]
    Details DOI WOS