Wiesemann, Claudia

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","135"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","158"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Braune, Florian"],["dc.contributor.author","Biller-Andorno, Nikola"],["dc.contributor.editor","Biller-Andorno, Nikola"],["dc.contributor.editor","Schaber, Peter"],["dc.contributor.editor","Schulz-Baldes, Annette"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:44:17Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:44:17Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.identifier.gro","3145412"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/3119"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","auflärung"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.publisher","Mentis Verlag"],["dc.publisher.place","Zürich"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Gibt es eine universale Bioethik?"],["dc.title","Informed Consent und seine Konkretisierung in der internationalen Bioethik. Zur medizinethischen Bedeutung von Aufklärung und Zustimmung in Taiwan und Deutschland"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","51"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","58"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","6"],["dc.contributor.author","Conradi, Elisabeth"],["dc.contributor.author","Biller-Andorno, Nikola"],["dc.contributor.author","Boos, Margarete"],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Christina"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.date.accessioned","2010-04-19T11:58:53Z"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-10-27T13:11:03Z"],["dc.date.available","2010-04-19T11:58:53Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-10-27T13:11:03Z"],["dc.date.issued","2003"],["dc.description.abstract","Conducting empirical research on gender in medical ethics is a challenge from a theoretical as well as a practical point of view. It still has to be clarified how gender aspects can be integrated without sustaining gender stereotypes. The developmental psychologist Carol Gilligan was among the first to question ethics from a gendered point of view. The notion of care introduced by her challenged conventional developmental psychology as well as moral philosophy. Gilligan was criticised, however, because her concept of ‘two different voices’ may reinforce gender stereotypes. Moreover, although Gilligan stressed relatedness, this is not reflected in her own empirical approach, which still focuses on individual moral reflection. Concepts from social psychology can help overcome both problems. Social categories like gender shape moral identity and moral decisions. If morality is understood as being lived through actions of persons in social relationships, gender becomes a helpful category of moral analysis. Our findings will provide a conceptual basis for the question how empirical research in medical ethics can successfully embrace a gendered perspective."],["dc.format.mimetype","application/pdf"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1023/a:1022514821765"],["dc.identifier.fs","14719"],["dc.identifier.gro","3146753"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?goescholar/4136"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/91554"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Migrated from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","1386-7423"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Fakultät für Biologie und Psychologie"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject.ddc","570"],["dc.title","Gender in medical ethics: re-examining the conceptual basis of empirical research."],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.version","submitted_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1653"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","27"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","1655"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","130"],["dc.contributor.author","Lenk, C."],["dc.contributor.author","Biller-Andorno, N."],["dc.contributor.author","Alt-Epping, B."],["dc.contributor.author","Anders, M."],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, C."],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-10-16T10:54:26Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-10-16T10:54:26Z"],["dc.date.issued","2005"],["dc.description.abstract","Mit dem Jahreswechsel 2003/2004 vollzog sich im stationären Sektor des deutschen Gesundheitswesens ein Wechsel von der bisherigen tagespauschalierten Vergütung medizinischer Leistungen hin zur Vergütung nach „Fallpauschalen” (diagnosis related groups, DRGs). Damit deutet sich zugleich ein Paradigmenwechsel in der Leistungsallokation an - weg von der gleichmäßigen Versorgung in der Fläche, hin zur Konzentration auf spezialisierte Zentren - dessen ethische Implikationen noch unklar sind. Einerseits erhofft man sich eine Reduzierung der Kosten im Bereich der stationären Krankenversorgung. Andererseits ist fraglich, ob diese Kostenreduktion nicht zu einer schlechteren Versorgung von multimorbiden und chronisch kranken Patienten führt. Das neue System dürfte zwar dem aktiven, autonom entscheidenden Patienten entgegenkommen, der ein Mehr an Informationen aus den geplanten Qualitätsberichten nutzt, um für sich ein Maximum an hochwertigen medizinischen Dienstleistungen zu realisieren. Auf der anderen Seite könnte das neue System aber Patientengruppen benachteiligen, die zur aktiven Nutzung solcher Informationen nicht oder weniger gut in der Lage sind. Ohne die Lage im deutschen Gesundheitswesen vor Einführung von Fallpauschalen positiv verklären zu wollen, sollen deshalb im vorliegenden Artikel anhand von Studienergebnissen aus den USA Konsequenzen abgeschätzt und in ihrer ethischen Dimension eingeordnet werden."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1055/s-2005-871880"],["dc.identifier.gro","3146726"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9398"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","0012-0472"],["dc.title","Ethik und Fallpauschalen"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","117"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ethik in der Medizin"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","121"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","15"],["dc.contributor.author","Biller-Andorno, Nikola"],["dc.contributor.author","Frewer, Andreas"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Neitzke, G."],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-10-16T10:54:27Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-10-16T10:54:27Z"],["dc.date.issued","2003"],["dc.format.mimetype","application/pdf"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00481-003-0224-7"],["dc.identifier.fs","14730"],["dc.identifier.gro","3146738"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?goescholar/4134"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9411"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","Migrated from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","0935-7335"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.access","openAccess"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject","Medizinethik; Lehre"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Lehrziele \"Medizinethik im Medizinstudium\""],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","submitted_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]