Wöhlke, Sabine

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Transplantation Journal"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","94"],["dc.contributor.author","Woehlke, S."],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:03:16Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:03:16Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.identifier.isi","000209846404126"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/24869"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Lippincott Williams & Wilkins"],["dc.publisher.place","Philadelphia"],["dc.title","Autonomy and Family: The Example of Living Organ Donation"],["dc.type","conference_abstract"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","424"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","427"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","14"],["dc.contributor.author","Wöhlke, Sabine"],["dc.contributor.author","Schicktanz, Silke"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:38:34Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:38:34Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1177/1556264619862395"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1556-2654"],["dc.identifier.issn","1556-2646"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/77371"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Special Issue: Why Ethically Reflect on Empirical Studies in Empirical Ethics? Case Studies and Commentaries"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","23"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ethik in der Medizin"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","34"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","27"],["dc.contributor.author","Hansen, Solveig Lena"],["dc.contributor.author","Woehlke, Sabine"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:00:38Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:00:38Z"],["dc.date.issued","2015"],["dc.description.abstract","Background In the movie Never Let Me Go, clones are depicted as highly vulnerable and heteronomous individuals, forced to donate their organs anonymously. In this paper, we analyze the depiction of the clones' socialization and personal development, scrutinizing references to bioethical aspects. Arguments As a symbolic work of fiction, this movie can be regarded as an abstract negotiation of limited agency. The clones are situated in \"privileged deprivation\"; from the audience's point of view, they are deprived and unable to evolve into autonomous agents-but from their own perspective within the dystopian system, they are still \"privileged\". We argue that this movie symbolically focuses on individuals who do not profit from modern medical progress or do not have enough agency to refuse it. Results Movies such as Never Let Me Go evoke a confrontation with underprivileged positions in the medical system, encouraging the audience to take the perspective of the marginalized.."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00481-014-0331-7"],["dc.identifier.isi","000349766500003"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/37849"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.relation.issn","1437-1618"],["dc.relation.issn","0935-7335"],["dc.title","\"We all know it; we just never say it.\" - Institutionalized disinformation as a precondition for vulnerability in the context of cloning and organ donation in Never Let Me Go"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","31"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","40"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","22"],["dc.contributor.author","Schaper, Manuel"],["dc.contributor.author","Wöhlke, Sabine"],["dc.contributor.author","Schicktanz, Silke"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:11:43Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:11:43Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s11019-018-9837-y"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1572-8633"],["dc.identifier.issn","1386-7423"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/71180"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","“I would rather have it done by a doctor”—laypeople’s perceptions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC GT) and its ethical implications"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","e12563"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","European Journal of Cancer Care"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","26"],["dc.contributor.author","Perry, J."],["dc.contributor.author","Wöhlke, S."],["dc.contributor.author","Heßling, A.C."],["dc.contributor.author","Schicktanz, S."],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T18:27:23Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T18:27:23Z"],["dc.date.issued","2016"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1111/ecc.12563"],["dc.identifier.issn","0961-5423"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/76327"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Institut für Allgemeinmedizin"],["dc.title","Why take part in personalised cancer research? Patients’ genetic misconception, genetic responsibility and incomprehension of stratification-an empirical-ethical examination"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.subtype","original_ja"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Transplantation Journal"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","94"],["dc.contributor.author","Woehlke, Sabine"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:03:14Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:03:14Z"],["dc.date.issued","2012"],["dc.format.extent","264"],["dc.identifier.isi","000209846401286"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/24864"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Lippincott Williams & Wilkins"],["dc.publisher.place","Philadelphia"],["dc.relation.issn","1534-6080"],["dc.relation.issn","0041-1337"],["dc.title","Gender Differences in Living Organ Recipients' Conceptions of the Body - Medical Anthropological and Ethical Perspectives"],["dc.type","conference_abstract"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.artnumber","S0955470X21000793"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","100673"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Transplantation Reviews"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","36"],["dc.contributor.author","Molina-Pérez, Alberto"],["dc.contributor.author","Delgado, Janet"],["dc.contributor.author","Frunza, Mihaela"],["dc.contributor.author","Morgan, Myfanwy"],["dc.contributor.author","Randhawa, Gurch"],["dc.contributor.author","de Wijdeven, Jeantine Reiger-Van"],["dc.contributor.author","Schicktanz, Silke"],["dc.contributor.author","Schiks, Eline"],["dc.contributor.author","Wöhlke, Sabine"],["dc.contributor.author","Rodríguez-Arias, David"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-06-01T09:39:02Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-06-01T09:39:02Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.description.sponsorship"," Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad"],["dc.description.sponsorship"," Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad"],["dc.description.sponsorship"," Agencia Estatal de Investigación"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.trre.2021.100673"],["dc.identifier.pii","S0955470X21000793"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/108373"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-572"],["dc.relation.issn","0955-470X"],["dc.rights.uri","https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/"],["dc.title","Should the family have a role in deceased organ donation decision-making? A systematic review of public knowledge and attitudes towards organ procurement policies in Europe"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","215"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ethik in der Medizin"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","222"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","25"],["dc.contributor.author","Woehlke, Sabine"],["dc.contributor.author","Hessling, Arndt"],["dc.contributor.author","Schicktanz, Silke"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T09:20:45Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T09:20:45Z"],["dc.date.issued","2013"],["dc.description.abstract","Definition of the problem In clinical research and practice, the new paradigm of \"personalised medicine\" raises questions about necessity, expectations, possibilities and risks. In an ongoing empirical-ethical study, we explore the perspectives of both researchers and patients regarding the implementation of \"personalised medicine\" in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. This study focuses on ethically relevant aspects in practice, including expectations towards, counseling on, and decision for \"personalized\" treatment, or research. Methods We conducted interviews (with 19 researchers and physicians and 28 patients) and participant observations during physician-patient consultations (n = 50). Arguments Uncovering differences and similarities in the perspectives of affected patients and physicians will allow potential conflicts in clinical practice to be detected and addressed as early as possible. Conclusions We were able to demonstrate that patients and physicians have different perspectives on \"personalised medicine\". This might lead to conflicts in clinical practice that should be addressed as early as possible."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00481-013-0263-7"],["dc.identifier.isi","000323661500006"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/28951"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.relation.issn","0935-7335"],["dc.title","When it gets personal in \"personalised medicine\": clinical researchers' and patients' perspectives on counseling and communication in an empirical-ethical comparison"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","e0252686"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","PLoS One"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","16"],["dc.contributor.author","Rodríguez-Arias, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Molina-Pérez, Alberto"],["dc.contributor.author","Hannikainen, Ivar R."],["dc.contributor.author","Delgado, Janet"],["dc.contributor.author","Söchtig, Benjamin"],["dc.contributor.author","Wöhlke, Sabine"],["dc.contributor.author","Schicktanz, Silke"],["dc.contributor.editor","Dor, Frank JMF"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-07-05T14:57:50Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-07-05T14:57:50Z"],["dc.date.issued","2021"],["dc.description.abstract","Background Consent policies for post-mortem organ procurement (OP) vary throughout Europe, and yet no studies have empirically evaluated the ethical implications of contrasting consent models. To fill this gap, we introduce a novel indicator of governance quality based on the ideal of informed support , and examine national differences on this measure through a quantitative survey of OP policy informedness and preferences in seven European countries. Methods Between 2017–2019, we conducted a convenience sample survey of students ( n = 2006) in Austria (AT), Belgium (BE), Denmark (DK), Germany (DE), Greece (GR), Slovenia (SI) and Spain (ES), asking participants about their donation preferences, as well as their beliefs and views about the policy in place. From these measures, we computed indices of informedness, policy support, and fulfilment of unexpressed preferences, which we compared across countries and consent systems. Results Our study introduces a tool for analyzing policy governance in the context of OP. Wide variation in policy awareness was observed: Most respondents in DK, DE, AT and BE correctly identified the policy in place, while those in SI, GR and ES did not. Respondents in opt-out countries (AT, BE, ES and GR) tended to support the policy in place (with one exception, i.e., SI), whereas those in opt-in countries (DE and DK) overwhelmingly opposed it. These results reveal stark differences in governance quality across countries and consent policies: We found a preponderance of informed opposition in opt-in countries and a general tendency towards support–either informed or uninformed–in opt-out countries. We also found informed divergence in opt-in countries and a tendency for convergence–either informed or uninformed–among opt-out countries. Conclusion Our study offers a novel tool for analyzing governance quality and illustrates, in the context of OP, how the strengths and weaknesses of different policy implementations can be estimated and compared using quantitative survey data."],["dc.description.abstract","Background Consent policies for post-mortem organ procurement (OP) vary throughout Europe, and yet no studies have empirically evaluated the ethical implications of contrasting consent models. To fill this gap, we introduce a novel indicator of governance quality based on the ideal of informed support , and examine national differences on this measure through a quantitative survey of OP policy informedness and preferences in seven European countries. Methods Between 2017–2019, we conducted a convenience sample survey of students ( n = 2006) in Austria (AT), Belgium (BE), Denmark (DK), Germany (DE), Greece (GR), Slovenia (SI) and Spain (ES), asking participants about their donation preferences, as well as their beliefs and views about the policy in place. From these measures, we computed indices of informedness, policy support, and fulfilment of unexpressed preferences, which we compared across countries and consent systems. Results Our study introduces a tool for analyzing policy governance in the context of OP. Wide variation in policy awareness was observed: Most respondents in DK, DE, AT and BE correctly identified the policy in place, while those in SI, GR and ES did not. Respondents in opt-out countries (AT, BE, ES and GR) tended to support the policy in place (with one exception, i.e., SI), whereas those in opt-in countries (DE and DK) overwhelmingly opposed it. These results reveal stark differences in governance quality across countries and consent policies: We found a preponderance of informed opposition in opt-in countries and a general tendency towards support–either informed or uninformed–in opt-out countries. We also found informed divergence in opt-in countries and a tendency for convergence–either informed or uninformed–among opt-out countries. Conclusion Our study offers a novel tool for analyzing governance quality and illustrates, in the context of OP, how the strengths and weaknesses of different policy implementations can be estimated and compared using quantitative survey data."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1371/journal.pone.0252686"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/87746"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-441"],["dc.relation.eissn","1932-6203"],["dc.title","Governance quality indicators for organ procurement policies"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Transplantation Reviews"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","33"],["dc.contributor.author","Molina-Pérez, Alberto"],["dc.contributor.author","Rodríguez-Arias, David"],["dc.contributor.author","Delgado-Rodríguez, Janet"],["dc.contributor.author","Morgan, Myfanwy"],["dc.contributor.author","Frunza, Mihaela"],["dc.contributor.author","Randhawa, Gurch"],["dc.contributor.author","Reiger-Van de Wijdeven, Jeantine"],["dc.contributor.author","Schiks, Eline"],["dc.contributor.author","Wöhlke, Sabine"],["dc.contributor.author","Schicktanz, Silke"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T15:21:39Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T15:21:39Z"],["dc.date.issued","2019"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1016/j.trre.2018.09.001"],["dc.identifier.issn","0955-470X"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/73102"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Public knowledge and attitudes towards consent policies for organ donation in Europe. A systematic review"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]