Options
Spindler, Gerald
Loading...
Preferred name
Spindler, Gerald
Official Name
Spindler, Gerald
Alternative Name
Spindler, G.
Now showing 1 - 9 of 9
2006Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","788"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","7"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","822"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","37"],["dc.contributor.author","Spindler, Gerald"],["dc.contributor.author","Leistner, Matthias"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:35:21Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:35:21Z"],["dc.date.issued","2006"],["dc.description.abstract","The responsibility for copyright infringement via the internet has, in both the past and in the present, given rise to heated discussions. Standing in opposition are, on the one hand, the uncompromisingly significant economic interests on the part of the content industry, and those of providers, telecommunications and technology industries on the other. This heated discussion is reflected, in particular, in the zigzag course of the legal application of liability with respect to providers in German and European law. This can be provider liability set forth in the DMCA in its enumerative form roughly resembles European law as seen in the E-Commerce Directive.(9) As far as the secondary copyright liability on the part of operators of P2P file-sharing systems is concerned, US case law in the decisions of numerous instances firstly solved the question of secondary liability of operators of centralised file-sharing systems. Meanwhile, after an initially restrained legal treatment of decentralised systems in lower courts, the US Supreme Court has also found an approach to deal with such decentralised systems in the world-renowned Grokster decision, which in this specific case led to an affirmation of secondary liability.(10) The chosen solution via inducement liability consciously leaves open some of the numerous questions raised by the rapid development of P2P file-sharing systems.(11) As far as this is concerned, a significant interest in comparing the approaches of the US \"interim solution\" with the treatment of P2P file-sharing systems in Germany and Europe seems to exist. This article puts forth an attempt to introduce the German and European perspective into the global discussion.(12) The questions raised within the scope of this article, which essentially relate to the liability of the operators of P2P file-sharing systems, quickly return to the fundamentals of liability law, in particular to the relationship of secondary responsibility for causes of risk and the primary liability of the actual rights infringer. To begin with, this article will clarify the technical facts (H). Subsequently, principal developments in European and, in particular, in German law will be discussed (III, IV). The approaches toward a solution described here will occasionally be compared with current developments in US law, where significant similarities in judgments exist, but also some differences.(13) Private international law problems which have been raised by worldwide operating file-sharing systems will also be briefly examined (V), as further reflection on possible international approaches to the issue of internet file sharing hardly seems helpful if it does not take into account the international dimension (VI)."],["dc.identifier.isi","000242693000002"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/45080"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.publisher","Verlag C H Beck"],["dc.relation.issn","0018-9855"],["dc.title","Secondary copyright infringement - New perspectives in Germany and Europe"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.status","published"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details WOS2011Monograph [["dc.contributor.author","Spindler, Gerald"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-05-03T10:43:03Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-05-03T10:43:03Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Das Recht der Unternehmensorganisation hat sich als eine der zentralen Anknüpfungspunkte im modernen Wirtschaftsrecht erwiesen. Nach zaghaften Anfängen in den achtziger Jahren werden heute Unternehmen mit zahlreichen Organisationspflichten aus den verschiedensten Rechtsbereichen konfrontiert. Prominentes Beispiel ist der Finanzbereich, der bis weit ins Detail reichende Vorgaben zur Einrichtung von Risikomanagementsystemen umzusetzen hat. Aber auch viele andere Bereiche des öffentlichen Rechts kennen derartige Organisationspflichten. Im Zivilrecht und auch im Strafrecht ist die Figur der Organisationspflicht ebenfalls seit langem bekannt, aber kaum in seine übergreifenden Zusammenhänge gestellt worden. Das Werk beleuchtet die verschiedenen Rechtsgrundlagen für die Organisationspflichten, ihre verfasssungsrechtlichen Grundlagen, die betriebswirtschaftlichen Konkretisierungsversuche einschließlich der Qualitätsmanagement- und Standardisierungsbewegungen auf der Ebene der ISO, die zivil- und strafrechtlichen Auswirkungen bis hin zur Haftung im Konzern und der persönlichen Verantwortlichkeit der Organvertreter. Die Arbeit stellt die diversen Pflichten und ihre Ausprägungen in einem rechtsgebietsübergreifenden und auch interdisziplinären Ansatz vor, wobei für eine stärkere Zurückhaltung und eine Hinwendung zu Zielvorgaben plädiert wird."],["dc.description.edition","2. unveränd. Aufl."],["dc.format.extent","1185"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.17875/gup2011-122"],["dc.identifier.isbn","978-3-86395-003-3"],["dc.identifier.ppn","751306290"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/11115"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/14069"],["dc.identifier.urn","urn:nbn:de:gbv:7-isbn-978-3-86395-003-3-8"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","Migrated from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.publisher","Universitätsverlag Göttingen"],["dc.publisher.place","Göttingen"],["dc.rights","CC BY-ND 3.0"],["dc.rights.access","openAccess"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0"],["dc.subject","Risikomanagementsysteme; Rechtsgrundlagen; Organisationspflichten; Qualitätsmanagement"],["dc.subject.ddc","340"],["dc.title","Unternehmensorganisationspflichten"],["dc.title.subtitle","Zivilrechtliche und öffentlich-rechtliche Regelungskonzepte"],["dc.type","book"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2002Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","81"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","85"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","158"],["dc.contributor.author","Spindler, Gerald"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-11-07T10:31:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-11-07T10:31:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2002"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1628/0932456022975646"],["dc.identifier.isi","000175076300009"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/44119"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.notes.submitter","Najko"],["dc.relation.issn","0932-4569"],["dc.title","How to dissolve a partnership - Comment"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI WOS2006Monograph [["dc.contributor.author","Spindler, Gerald"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-05-03T10:43:03Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-05-03T10:43:03Z"],["dc.date.issued","2006"],["dc.description.abstract","Die gerichtsnahe Mediation sucht neue Wege zur Streitschlichtung während eines bereits rechtshängigen Verfahrens. Das niedersächsische Projekt hat Modellcharakter für die ganze Bundesrepublik. Im vorliegenden Buch werden die juristischen Probleme der gerichtsnahen Mediation und nötige Reformen untersucht, ebenso wie die ökonomischen Anreizstrukturen für die Beteiligten. In die Untersuchung sind die Ergebnisse einer breit angelegten Befragung der an der gerichtsnahen Mediation Beteiligten eingeflossen."],["dc.format.extent","205"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.17875/gup2006-119"],["dc.identifier.isbn","978-3-938616-67-3"],["dc.identifier.ppn","52254102X"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?goescholar/3187"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/14067"],["dc.identifier.urn","urn:nbn:de:gbv:7-isbn-3-938616-67-9-6"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.publisher","Universitätsverlag Göttingen"],["dc.publisher.place","Göttingen"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Juristische Fakultät"],["dc.rights","CC BY-ND 2.0"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0"],["dc.subject.ddc","340"],["dc.title","Gerichtsnahe Mediation in Niedersachsen"],["dc.title.subtitle","Eine juristisch-rechtsökonomische Analyse"],["dc.title.subtitle","Abschlussbericht im Auftrag des Niedersächsischen Ministeriums für Justiz und des Niedersächsischen Ministeriums für Wissenschaft und Kultur"],["dc.type","book"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2011Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","315"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","3"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Consumer Policy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","336"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","34"],["dc.contributor.author","Spindler, Gerald"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:53:14Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:53:14Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","The article deals with behavioural assumptions in legal norms, in particular with regard to investor protection norms in Europe and Germany as well as court rulings. Whereas traditional legal norms are based on the assumption of rationale behaviour, the financials crisis has demonstrated the pitfalls of the classical notions of economics, thus leading to new insights of behavioural economics. However, it is still unclear how behavioural economics may serve as a means to improve legal protection of investors. Neither a strong paternalism nor a simple extension of information obligation may suffice in the future."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s10603-011-9165-6"],["dc.identifier.fs","582992"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/7153"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/60374"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.publisher","Springer"],["dc.publisher.place","Boston"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Behavioural Finance and Investor Protection Regulations"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2014Monograph [["dc.contributor.author","Spindler, Gerald"],["dc.date.accessioned","2018-05-03T10:43:08Z"],["dc.date.available","2018-05-03T10:43:08Z"],["dc.date.issued","2014"],["dc.description.abstract","In diesem von der Bundestagsfraktion Bündnis 90/Die Grünen in Auftrag gegebenem ergebnisoffenem Gutachten untersucht Prof. Spindler die rechtliche und ökonomische Umsetzbarkeit sowie Ausgestaltung eines Ansatzes zur sog. „Kulturflatrate“. Die Fragestellung war, ob ein Pauschalvergütungsansatz auf Breitbandanschlüsse ein Baustein für ein gerechteres, modernes Urheberrecht, für angemessene Vergütung für die UrheberInnen und einen gesellschaftlichen Interessensausgleich sein kann. Das umfassende und detailreiche Gutachten leistet einen wesentlichen Beitrag zur Diskussion um die Zukunft des Urheberrechts, die in Zeiten des globalen Internets in praktisch jedem Land geführt wird. Es wird vollumfänglich der Öffentlichkeit zugänglich gemacht, damit die Ergebnisse von allen Interessierten genutzt und weiterentwickelt werden können. Prof. Spindler zeigt in seinem Gutachten auf, dass ein Pauschalvergütungsansatz verfassungsrechtlich zulässig und ein attraktives Modell zur angemessenen Vergütung für Kreative sein kann. Für die Situation der NutzerInnen bietet er eine geeignete Alternative zu repressiven und gesellschaftlich höchst konfliktträchtigen Formen der Rechtsdurchsetzung. Gleichzeitig wird aber auch auf gewichtige Schwierigkeiten und Hürden bei der Umsetzung eines solchen Modells hingewiesen. Das Gutachten und dieser Text erschienen zunächst unter der Creative Commons Lizenz BY-NC-ND auf der Internetpräsenz der Bundestagsfraktion von Bündnis 90/ Die Grünen. Diese Überarbeitung hat den Stand 08. Januar 2014."],["dc.description.abstract","The Internet and the proceeding digitalisation of content - such as music, videos and written texts - have led to profound and complex challenges in the field of Copyright Law, especially with regard to questions of enforcement as well as adequate compensation of right holders. In recent years, several alternative compensation schemes have been proposed, seeking to solve these issues. In Germany, the discussion still focuses on the so-called \"cultural flatrate\", that is, in a nutshell, a limitation to copyrights which would legalize sharing of content online. Every holder of a broadband connection to the Internet would have to pay a monthly fee which would be used to remunerate the right holders. This advisory opinion was compiled on behalf of the parliamentary group of the German political party \"Bündnis 90/DIE GRÜNEN\". The author comprehensively analyses the feasibility of the described alternative compensation scheme under German and European law, discussing both legal and economic obstacles and possible impacts based on a variety of different economic prerequisites."],["dc.format.extent","241"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.17875/gup2014-158"],["dc.identifier.isbn","978-3-86395-128-3"],["dc.identifier.ppn","778656314"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/10003"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/14108"],["dc.identifier.urn","urn:nbn:de:gbv:7-isbn-978-3-86395-128-3-3"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","Migrated from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","zu prüfen"],["dc.publisher","Universitätsverlag Göttingen"],["dc.publisher.place","Göttingen"],["dc.rights","CC BY-NC-ND 4.0"],["dc.rights.access","openAccess"],["dc.rights.uri","https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0"],["dc.subject","Urheberrecht; Kulturflatrate; Pauschalvergütungsansatz; Rechtswissenschaften; Gutachten"],["dc.subject.ddc","340"],["dc.title","Rechtsprobleme und wirtschaftliche Vertretbarkeit einer Kulturflatrate"],["dc.title.subtitle","Überarbeitung des im Auftrag der Bundestagsfraktion Bündins 90 / Die Grünen erstellten Gutachtens Stand 08. Januar 2014"],["dc.type","book"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2011Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","690"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","731"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","40"],["dc.contributor.author","Spindler, Gerald"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-09T11:54:15Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-09T11:54:15Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Der Zugang zu Informationen spielt seit jeher im Gesellschafts- und Zivilprozessrecht eine immanente Rolle. Durch das Informationsfreiheitsgesetz, das den Zugang zu amtlichen Informationen und Unterlagen regelt, haben Kläger und Auskunftssuchende neue Möglichkeiten erhalten, die aber gleichzeitig auch dazu genutzt werden können, die im Gesellschaftsund Zivilprozessrecht bestehenden Schranken für Auskünfte ebenso wie die Darlegungs- und Beweislast zu verändern. Insbesondere im Kapitalmarktrecht sind derartige Auskunftsansprüche von Relevanz. Der Beitrag geht dem Konfliktverhältnis nach und plädiert für eine Einschränkung des sonst voraussetzungslosen Informationszugangsanspruchs bei kollidierenden Grundrechten Dritter."],["dc.description.abstract","Access to information is one of the crucial elements in corporate law as well as in civil procedure law. The act on freedom of information grants access to all information and document of authorities and supervision agencies. Thus, plaintiffs have new opportunities to access relevant information which could also be used to modify and overcome the burden of proof. In particular, these ways to access information are essential for actions for damages in securities law. The article discusses conflicts between freedom of access to information and legitimate confidentiality, arguing that the free access to information has to be restricted in order to balance interests."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1515/zgre.2011.690"],["dc.identifier.fs","582999"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/8658"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/60604"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","1612-7048"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.title","Informationsfreiheit und Finanzmarktaufsicht"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details DOI2011Journal Article [["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","114"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","2"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","jipitec"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","119"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","2"],["dc.contributor.author","Bizer, Kilian"],["dc.contributor.author","Lankau, Matthias"],["dc.contributor.author","Spindler, Gerald"],["dc.contributor.author","Zimbehl, Philipp"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-10T08:14:06Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-10T08:14:06Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","Within the international community there have been many calls for better protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs), for which classic instruments of intellectual property rights do not seem to fit. In response, at least five model laws have been advanced within the last 40 years. These are referred to as sui generis because, though they generally belong to the realm of intellectual property they structurally depart from classic copyright law to accommodate the needs of the holders of TCEs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a well-founded basis for national policy makers who wish to implement protection for TCEs within their country. This is achieved by systematically comparing and evaluating economic effects that can be expected to result from these regulatory alternatives and a related system or private ordering. Specifically, we compare if and how protection preferences of local communities are met as well as the social costs that are likely to arise from the different model laws."],["dc.format.extent","6"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/9231"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/61431"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Migrated from goescholar"],["dc.relation.issn","2190-3387"],["dc.rights.access","openAccess"],["dc.subject","Sui generis; traditional cultural expressions; policy; private ordering; law and economics"],["dc.subject.ddc","330"],["dc.title","Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details2022Lecture [["dc.contributor.author","Spindler, Gerald"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-12-22T10:20:29Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-12-22T10:20:29Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.format.mimetype","mp3"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/97219"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.relation.conference","Künstliche Intelligenz, Data Science und Gesellschaft"],["dc.relation.date","2022-01-18"],["dc.relation.eventlocation","Göttingen"],["dc.relation.multimedia","https://goedoc.uni-goettingen.de/docs/audio/ring2022-01-18.mp3"],["dc.relation.multimedia","https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjqOLKyL4wg"],["dc.title","KI und Regulierung - der Vorschalg der EU-Kommission zur Regulierung der KI"],["dc.type","lecture"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]Details