Options
Role of tumour-free margin distance for loco-regional control in vulvar cancer-a subset analysis of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynakologische Onkologie CaRE-1 multicenter study
ISSN
1879-0852
0959-8049
Date Issued
2016
Author(s)
Woelber, Linn
Griebel, Lis-Femke
Eulenburg, Christine
Sehouli, Jalid
Jueckstock, Julia
Hilpert, Felix
de Gregorio, Nikolaus
Hasenburg, Annette
Ignatov, Atanas
Hillemanns, Peter
Fuerst, Sophie
Strauss, Hans-Georg
Baumann, Klaus H.
Thiel, Falk Clemens
Mustea, Alexander
Meier, Werner
Harter, Philipp
Wimberger, Pauline
Hanker, Lars Christian
Schmalfeldt, Barbara
Canzler, Ulrich
Fehm, Tanja
Luyten, Alexander
Kosse, Jens
Heiss, Christoph
Hantschmann, Peer
Mallmann, Peter
Tanner, Berno
Pfisterer, Jacobus
Richter, Barbara
Neuser, Petra
Mahner, Sven
DOI
10.1016/j.ejca.2016.09.038
Abstract
Aim of the study: A tumour-free pathological resection margin of >= 8 mm is considered state-of-the-art. Available evidence is based on heterogeneous cohorts. This study was designed to clarify the relevance of the resection margin for loco-regional control in vulvar cancer. Methods: AGO-CaRE-1 is a large retrospective study. Patients (n = 1618) with vulvar cancer >= FIGO stage IB treated at 29 German gynecologic-cancer-centres 1998-2008 were included. This subgroup analysis focuses on solely surgically treated node-negative patients with complete tumour resection (n = 289). Results: Of the 289 analysed patients, 141 (48.8%) had pT1b, 140 (48.4%) pT2 and 8 (2.8%) pT3 tumours. One hundred twenty-five (43.3%) underwent complete vulvectomy, 127 (43.9%) partial vulvectomy and 37 (12.8%) radical local excision. The median minimal resection margin was 5 mm (1 mm-33 mm); all patients received groin staging, in 86.5% with full dissection. Median follow-up was 35.1 months. 46 (15.9%) patients developed recurrence, thereof 34 (11.8%) at the vulva, after a median of 18.3 months. Vulvar recurrence rates were 12.6% in patients with a margin <8mm and 10.2% in patients with a margin >= 8 mm. When analysed as a continuous variable, the margin distance had no statistically significant impact on local recurrence (HR per mm increase: 0.930, 95% CI: 0.849-1.020; p=0.125). Multivariate analyses did also not reveal a significant association between the margin and local recurrence neither when analysed as continuous variable nor categorically based on the 8 mm cutoff. Results were consistent when looking at disease-free-survival and time-to-recurrence at any site (HR per mm increase: 0.949, 95% CI: 0.864-1.041; p = 0.267). Conclusions: The need for a minimal margin of 8 mm could not be confirmed in the large and homogeneous node-negative cohort of the AGO-CaRE database. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.