Options
The European baseline series in 10 European Countries, 2005/2006-Results of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA)
ISSN
0105-1873
Date Issued
2009
Author(s)
Uter, Wolfgang
Raemsch, Christiane
Aberer, Werner
Ayala, Fabio
Balato, Anna
Beliauskiene, Aiste
Fortina, Anna Belloni
Bircher, Andreas J.
Brasch, Jochen
Chowdhury, Mahbub M. U.
Coenraads, Pieter-Jan
Schuttelaar, Marie-Louise
Cooper, Sue
Corradin, Maria Teresa
Elsner, Peter
English, John S. C.
Fartasch, Manige
Mahler, Vera
Frosch, Peter J.
Gawkrodger, David J.
Gimenez-Arnau, Ana-Maria
Green, Cathy M.
Horne, Helen L.
Jolanki, Riitta
King, Codagh M.
Krecisz, Beata
Kiec-Swierczynska, Marta
Ormerod, Anthony D.
Orton, David I.
Peserico, Andrea
Rantanen, Tapio
Rustemeyer, Thomas
Sansom, Jane E.
Simon, Dagmar
Statham, Barry N.
Wilkinson, Mark
Schnuch, Axel
Abstract
Background Continual surveillance based on patch test results has proved useful for the identification of contact allergy. Objectives To provide a current view on the spectrum of contact allergy to important sensitizers across Europe. Patients/Methods Clinical and patch test data of 19 793 patients patch tested in 2005/2006 in the 31 participating departments from 10 European countries (the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies' (ESSCA) www.essca-dc.org) were descriptively analysed, aggregated to four European regions. Results Nickel sulfate remains the most common allergen with standardized prevalences ranging from 19.7% (central Europe) to 24.4% (southern Europe). While a number of allergens shows limited variation across the four regions, such as Myroxylon pereirae (5.3-6.8%), cobalt chloride (6.2-8.8%) or thiuram mix (1.7-2.4%), the differences observed with other allergens may hint on underlying differences in exposures, for example: dichromate 2.4% in the UK (west) versus 4.5-5.9% in the remaining EU regions, methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone 4.1% in the South versus 2.1-2.7% in the remaining regions. Conclusions Notwithstanding residual methodological variation (affecting at least some 'difficult' allergens) tackled by ongoing efforts for standardization, a comparative analysis as presented provides (i) a broad overview on contact allergy frequencies and (ii) interesting starting points for further, in-depth investigation.