Wiesemann, Claudia

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","289"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","5"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Reproduktionsmedizin"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","290"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","17"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-10-16T10:54:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-10-16T10:54:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2002"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s004440100291"],["dc.identifier.gro","3146745"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9419"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","1434-6931"],["dc.title","Die Debatte um den moralischen Status des Embryos"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","591"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","10"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Das Gesundheitswesen"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","596"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","63"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-10-16T10:54:27Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-10-16T10:54:27Z"],["dc.date.issued","2001"],["dc.description.abstract","Ziel der Untersuchung: Das Recht auf Selbstbestimmung des Patienten wird heute von vielen Seiten gefordert und eingeklagt. Umso wichtiger ist es zu untersuchen, inwiefern die Organisation des Gesundheitswesens Strukturen vorgibt, die einer echten Selbstbestimmung des Patienten im Wege stehen.Ergebnisse und Schlussfolgerungen: Die Geschichte der Entstehung des modernen Gesundheitswesens gibt Hinweise auf solche strukturellen Einschränkungen. Aber auch aus dem Blickwinkel der modernen Medizinethik lassen sich systematische Bedingungen aufzeigen, welche dem Wunsch nach mehr Patientenautonomie entgegenstehen. Eigenverantwortlichkeit muss mit der Möglichkeit zur Mitbestimmung Hand in Hand gehen, sonst wird sie zur Farce. Der Beitrag zeigt notwendige Maßnahmen für eine Gesundheitsreform aus Patientenperspektive auf."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1055/s-2001-17876"],["dc.identifier.gro","3146736"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9409"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","0941-3790"],["dc.title","Selbstbestimmte Patienten? - Die Nutznießer der Medizin und ihre Rechte"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","855"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","6"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","871"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","58"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Beier, Katharina"],["dc.date.accessioned","2019-07-10T08:13:33Z"],["dc.date.available","2019-07-10T08:13:33Z"],["dc.date.issued","2010"],["dc.description.abstract","Human reproduction in the age of reprogenetics raises fundamental ethical and political questions. Critics of so-called liberal eugenics like Jürgen Habermas have sparked an ethical debate on whether selective genetic manipulation might undermine the natural basis of the moral self-conception and autonomy of future generations. Contrary to this perception, the authors of this article argue for a dialectic understanding of the moral challenges arising from human natality: Freedom and dependency, sociality and human embodiment, autonomy and relatedness likewise determine our human existence as moral beings. As an answer to these challenges, the authors develop a dialectic understanding of parenthood in the age of reprogenetics, thereby transcending present debates of modern reproductive medicine."],["dc.identifier.fs","576851"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gs-1/6172"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/61272"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","Merged from goescholar"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Universitätsmedizin Göttingen"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Die Dialektik der Elternschaft im Zeitalter der Reprogenetik"],["dc.title.alternative","Ein ethischer Dialog"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.version","published_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","9"],["dc.contributor.author","Hädicke, Maximiliane"],["dc.contributor.author","Föcker, Manuel"],["dc.contributor.author","Romer, Georg"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.date.accessioned","2022-12-01T08:30:45Z"],["dc.date.available","2022-12-01T08:30:45Z"],["dc.date.issued","2022"],["dc.description.abstract","Abstract\n \n Increasingly, transgender minors are seeking medical care such as puberty-suppressing or gender-affirming hormone therapies. Yet, whether these interventions should be performed at all is highly controversial. Some healthcare practitioners oppose irreversible interventions, considering it their duty to protect children from harm. Others view minors, like adults, as transgender individuals who must be protected from discrimination. The underlying ethical question is presented as a problem of priority. Is it primarily relevant that\n minors\n are involved? Or should decision makers focus on the fact that they treat\n transgender individuals\n ? The paper explores the relevance for medical practice. We provide results of an interview study with German healthcare professionals. We discuss the general question whether prioritization among different group memberships of the\n same\n person is ethically defensible. We conclude that priority conflicts between group memberships of the\n same\n person can be deceptive and should be addressed by an intersectional approach. Eventually, we discuss practical implications."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1017/S0963180122000251"],["dc.identifier.pii","S0963180122000251"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/117972"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI-Import GROB-621"],["dc.relation.eissn","1469-2147"],["dc.relation.issn","0963-1801"],["dc.title","Healthcare Professionals’ Conflicts When Treating Transgender Youth: Is It Necessary to Prioritize Protection Over Respect?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","135"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","158"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Braune, Florian"],["dc.contributor.author","Biller-Andorno, Nikola"],["dc.contributor.editor","Biller-Andorno, Nikola"],["dc.contributor.editor","Schaber, Peter"],["dc.contributor.editor","Schulz-Baldes, Annette"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-09-07T11:44:17Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-09-07T11:44:17Z"],["dc.date.issued","2008"],["dc.identifier.gro","3145412"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/3119"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","auflärung"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.notes.submitter","chake"],["dc.publisher","Mentis Verlag"],["dc.publisher.place","Zürich"],["dc.relation.ispartof","Gibt es eine universale Bioethik?"],["dc.title","Informed Consent und seine Konkretisierung in der internationalen Bioethik. Zur medizinethischen Bedeutung von Aufklärung und Zustimmung in Taiwan und Deutschland"],["dc.type","book_chapter"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","unknown"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","63"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Ethik in der Medizin"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","70"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","18"],["dc.contributor.author","Ude-Koeller, Susanne"],["dc.contributor.author","Müller, Luise"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-10-16T10:54:26Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-10-16T10:54:26Z"],["dc.date.issued","2006"],["dc.description.abstract","Wir diskutieren ethische Probleme der medizinischen Behandlung intersexueller Kinder. Gefragt wird nach dem Stellenwert von Elternwünschen nach eindeutiger Geschlechtszuweisung sowie nach den Konfliktfeldern, die zum einen zwischen konkurrierenden Wunschvorstellungen der Eltern und der behandelnden Ärzte, zum andern zwischen Kindeswohl und Kinderrechten entstehen können. Gegenwärtig wird Neugeborenen mit anatomisch uneindeutigem Genital trotz unsicherer Prognose über die Behandlungsergebnisse oft noch ein Geschlecht zugewiesen und operativ erstellt. Dieses Vorgehen ist von verschiedenen Seiten ethisch heftig kritisiert worden. Kipnis u. Diamond forderten 1998 im „Journal of Clinical Ethics“ ein Moratorium für alle nicht vital indizierten geschlechtskorrigierenden Eingriffe. Diese Forderung orientiert sich am Interesse des zukünftigen Erwachsenen, betont dessen prospektive Autonomie und klammert den Elternwunsch aus. Dieses „Modell des antizipierten Konsenses“ kann jedoch mit Bezug auf Neugeborene und Kleinkinder bedeutsame Aspekte des Eltern-Kind-Verhältnisses nicht angemessen erfassen. Im Aufsatz werden Argumente angeführt, die es aus Sicht einer Ethik der Elternschaft rechtfertigen, ethische Entscheidungen auf der Basis eines beziehungsorientierten Modells zu treffen. In unserem Modell fallen Elternwünsche ethisch ins Gewicht."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00481-006-0414-1"],["dc.identifier.gro","3146724"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9396"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","0935-7335"],["dc.title","Junge oder Mädchen?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","613"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","8"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Der Gynäkologe"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","615"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","51"],["dc.contributor.author","Beier, Henning M."],["dc.contributor.author","Bujard, Martin"],["dc.contributor.author","Diedrich, Klaus"],["dc.contributor.author","Dreier, Horst"],["dc.contributor.author","Frister, Helmut"],["dc.contributor.author","Kentenich, Heribert"],["dc.contributor.author","Kreß, Hartmut"],["dc.contributor.author","Krüssel, Jan-Steffen"],["dc.contributor.author","Ludwig, Annika K."],["dc.contributor.author","Schumann, Eva"],["dc.contributor.author","Strowitzki, Thomas"],["dc.contributor.author","Taupitz, Jochen"],["dc.contributor.author","Thaler, Christian J."],["dc.contributor.author","Thorn, Petra"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.contributor.author","Zenner, Hans-Peter"],["dc.date.accessioned","2020-12-10T14:08:44Z"],["dc.date.available","2020-12-10T14:08:44Z"],["dc.date.issued","2018"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1007/s00129-018-4258-9"],["dc.identifier.eissn","1433-0393"],["dc.identifier.issn","0017-5994"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/70539"],["dc.language.iso","de"],["dc.notes.intern","DOI Import GROB-354"],["dc.title","Ein Fortpflanzungsmedizingesetz für Deutschland"],["dc.title.alternative","A law on reproductive medicine for Germany"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","85"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Medical Ethics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","87"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","30"],["dc.contributor.author","Lenk, C."],["dc.contributor.author","Radenbach, K."],["dc.contributor.author","Dahl, Matthias"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-10-16T10:54:28Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-10-16T10:54:28Z"],["dc.date.issued","2004"],["dc.description.abstract","Objectives: Clinical trials in humans in Germany—as in many other countries—must be approved by localresearch ethics committees (RECs). The current study has been designed to document and evaluatedecisions of chairpersons of RECs in the problematic field of non-therapeutic research with minors. Theauthors’ purpose was to examine whether non-therapeutic research was acceptable for chairpersons atall, and whether there was certainty on how to decide in research trials involving more than minimal risk.Design: In a questionnaire, REC chairpersons had to evaluate five different scenarios with (in parts) nontherapeuticresearch. The scenarios described realistic potential research projects with minors, involvingincreasing levels of risk for the research participants. The chairpersons had to decide whether therespective projects should be approved.Methods: A total of 49 German REC chairpersons were sent questionnaires; 29 questionnaires werereturned. The main measurements were approval or rejection of research scenarios.Results: Chairpersons of German RECs generally tend to accept non-therapeutic research with minors ifthe apparent risk for the participating children is low. If the risk is clearly higher than ‘‘minimal’’, thechairpersons’ decisions differ widely.Conclusion: The fact that there seem to be different attitudes of chairpersons to non-therapeutic researchwith minors is problematic from an ethical point of view. It suggests a general uncertainty about thestandards of protection for minor research participants in Germany. Therefore, further ethical and legalregulation of non-therapeutic research with minors in Germany seems necessary."],["dc.format.mimetype","application/pdf"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1136/jme.2003.005900"],["dc.identifier.fs","17497"],["dc.identifier.gro","3146746"],["dc.identifier.pmid","14872082"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?goescholar/4135"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9420"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Migrated from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","0306-6800"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.access","openAccess"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject","REC, research ethics committee"],["dc.subject.ddc","610"],["dc.title","Non-therapeutic research with minors: how do chairpersons of German research ethics committees decide?"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dc.type.version","submitted_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","51"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","1"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","58"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","6"],["dc.contributor.author","Conradi, Elisabeth"],["dc.contributor.author","Biller-Andorno, Nikola"],["dc.contributor.author","Boos, Margarete"],["dc.contributor.author","Sommer, Christina"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.date.accessioned","2010-04-19T11:58:53Z"],["dc.date.accessioned","2021-10-27T13:11:03Z"],["dc.date.available","2010-04-19T11:58:53Z"],["dc.date.available","2021-10-27T13:11:03Z"],["dc.date.issued","2003"],["dc.description.abstract","Conducting empirical research on gender in medical ethics is a challenge from a theoretical as well as a practical point of view. It still has to be clarified how gender aspects can be integrated without sustaining gender stereotypes. The developmental psychologist Carol Gilligan was among the first to question ethics from a gendered point of view. The notion of care introduced by her challenged conventional developmental psychology as well as moral philosophy. Gilligan was criticised, however, because her concept of ‘two different voices’ may reinforce gender stereotypes. Moreover, although Gilligan stressed relatedness, this is not reflected in her own empirical approach, which still focuses on individual moral reflection. Concepts from social psychology can help overcome both problems. Social categories like gender shape moral identity and moral decisions. If morality is understood as being lived through actions of persons in social relationships, gender becomes a helpful category of moral analysis. Our findings will provide a conceptual basis for the question how empirical research in medical ethics can successfully embrace a gendered perspective."],["dc.format.mimetype","application/pdf"],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1023/a:1022514821765"],["dc.identifier.fs","14719"],["dc.identifier.gro","3146753"],["dc.identifier.purl","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?goescholar/4136"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/91554"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.intern","Migrated from goescholar"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","1386-7423"],["dc.relation.orgunit","Fakultät für Biologie und Psychologie"],["dc.rights","Goescholar"],["dc.rights.uri","https://goescholar.uni-goettingen.de/licenses"],["dc.subject.ddc","570"],["dc.title","Gender in medical ethics: re-examining the conceptual basis of empirical research."],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","yes"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","yes"],["dc.type.version","submitted_version"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]

[["dc.bibliographiccitation.firstpage","216"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.issue","4"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.journal","Journal of Medical Ethics"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.lastpage","220"],["dc.bibliographiccitation.volume","37"],["dc.contributor.author","Wiesemann, Claudia"],["dc.date.accessioned","2017-10-16T10:54:29Z"],["dc.date.available","2017-10-16T10:54:29Z"],["dc.date.issued","2011"],["dc.description.abstract","The paper discusses the current medical practice of ‘gender verification’ in sports from an ethical point of view. It takes the recent public discussion about 800 m runner Caster Semenya as a starting point. At the World Championships in Athletics 2009 in Berlin, Germany, Semenya was challenged by competitors as being a so called ‘sex impostor’. A medical examination to verify her sex ensued. The author analyses whether athletes like Semenya could claim a right not to know that is generally acknowledged in human genetics and enforced by international and national genetic privacy laws. The relevance of this right for genetic diagnosis in sports is discussed. To this end, the interests of the athlete concerned and of third parties are balanced according to the expected benefits and harms.Harm is documented in a number of cases and includes unjustified disqualification, severe sex and gender identity crisis, demeaning reactions, social isolation, depression and suicide. Benefits are dubious as most cases of intersex are considered irrelevant for sports competition. It has to be concluded that the benefits to be gained from ‘gender verification’ in sports via genetic testing do not outweigh the grave individual disadvantages. The current practice of athletic associations to largely ignore the right of competitors not to know does not comply with prevailing ethical provisions on the protection of sensitive personal data. Therefore, genetic ‘gender verification’ in sports should be abolished."],["dc.identifier.doi","10.1136/jme.2010.039081"],["dc.identifier.gro","3146754"],["dc.identifier.uri","https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?gro-2/9429"],["dc.language.iso","en"],["dc.notes.status","final"],["dc.relation.issn","0306-6800"],["dc.title","Is there a right not to know one's sex? The ethics of 'gender verification' in women's sports competition"],["dc.type","journal_article"],["dc.type.internalPublication","unknown"],["dc.type.peerReviewed","no"],["dspace.entity.type","Publication"]]